Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2709 (2.46 seconds)

State vs . (1) Sunil @ Nanhe on 25 October, 2016

U/s 82  Cr.P.C . only and had not participated in the investigation of the present case.   6. Thereafter, statements U/s 313  ... noted that charge for the offence punishable U/s 395  IPC  has also been framed against the accused persons in this case
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . (1). Pintu on 27 February, 2016

this Court framed charge for the offence punishable U/s 395 read with Section 397 IPC against accused Pintu, Lalit @ Guddu and Sonu ... also framed separate charge for the offence punishable U/s 395 read with Section 397 IPC against accused Naresh @ Nakli @ Rinku vide order
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs (1) Suraj @ Anuj on 27 January, 2020

2007 Police Station : Dwarka Under Sections : 395/397 IPC Date of committal to Sessions Court : 05.11.2007 Date on which judgment was reserved ... this regard, he recorded his supplementary statement and Section 395 / 297 IPC were added and investigation of the case was handed over
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . (1). Jasbir on 4 November, 2015

Police Station : Shahbad Dairy Under Sections : 395/397 IPC & 25/27 Arms Act Date of committal to Sessions Court: 12.03.2015 Date ... Court was pleased to frame charge for the offence punishable U/s 395 IPC against all five accused persons namely Jasbir, Mukesh, Deepu
Delhi District Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next