scope of
jurisdiction under these two provisions, i.e.,
Section 397 and Section 482 of the Code and
the fine line of jurisdictional distinction ... quashing of charge either in exercise of
jurisdiction under Section 397 or Section 482
of the Code or together, as the case
482 stands
repelled when the revisional power under Section 397
overlaps. The opening words of Section 482 contradict
rt this contention because nothing ... jurisdiction with regard
of
to quashing of charge either under Section 397 or Section 482 Cr.P.C. or
together as the case which have
scope of jurisdiction under these two provisions, i.e., Section 397 and Section 482 of the Code and the fine line of jurisdictional distinction ... quashing of charge either in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 397 or Section 482 of the Code or together, as the case
scope of jurisdiction under
these two provisions i.e. Section 397 and Section 482 of the
Code and the fine line of jurisdictional distinction ... quashing of charge either in exercise
of jurisdiction under Section 397 or Section 482 of the Code or
together, as the case
scope of jurisdiction under these two provisions, i.e., Section 397 and Section 482 of the Code and the fine line of jurisdictional distinction ... quashing of charge either in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 397 or Section 482 of the Code or together, as the case
scope of jurisdiction under these two provisions, i.e., Section 397 and Section 482 of the Code and the fine line of jurisdictional distinction ... quashing of charge either in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 397 or Section 482 of the Code or together, as the case
Judge is in seisin of the matter, the
petitioner can invoke Section 482 / 397 / 401 Cr.P.C. to redress his grievances, if
there
scope of jurisdiction under these two provisions, i.e., Section 397 and Section 482 of the Code and the fine line of jurisdictional distinction ... quashing of charge either in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 397 or Section 482 of the Code or together, as the case
would lie on
same facts before the High Court under Sections 482 &
397 r/w S.401 of Cr.P.C. And relying ... Sections 397(3) or 399(3) of the Cr.P.C.
6
would not operate and the order can be quashed under
Section 482 directly
scope of jurisdiction under these two provisions, i.e., Section 397 and Section 482 of the Code and the fine line of jurisdictional distinction ... quashing of charge either in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 397 or Section 482 of the Code or together, as the case
