magnitude and are not
as limited as the power under Section 397 . Section 482 can be
invoked where the order in question is neither ... scope of jurisdiction under these two
provisions, i.e., Section 397 and Section 482 of the Code and
the fine line of jurisdictional distinction
expressly barred under sub-section (2) of
Section 397 of the 1973 Code the inherent powers contained in
Section 482 would not be available ... defeat the bar contained in
Section 397(2). Section 482 of the 1973 Code contains the inherent
powers of the Court and does not confer
scope of jurisdiction under these two
provisions, i.e., Section 397 and Section 482 of the Code and the fine line
of jurisdictional distinction ... quashing of charge either in
exercise of jurisdiction under Section 397 or Section 482 of the Code or
together, as the case
scope of jurisdiction
under these two provisions i.e. Section 397 and
Section 482 of the Code and the fine line of
jurisdictional distinction ... quashing
of charge either in exercise of jurisdiction under
Section 397 or Section 482 of the Code or
together, as the case
scope of jurisdiction
under these two provisions i.e. Section 397 and Section 482 of the
Code and the fine line of jurisdictional distinction ... quashing of charge either in exercise of
jurisdiction under Section 397 or Section 482 of the Code or
together, as the case
scope of
jurisdiction under these two provisions, i.e.,
Section 397 and Section 482 of the Code and
the fine line of jurisdictional distinction ... quashing of charge
either in exercise of jurisdiction under Section
397 or Section 482 of the Code or together,
as the case
scope of
jurisdiction under these two provisions i.e.
Section 397 and Section 482 of the Code
and the fine line of jurisdictional
distinction ... quashing of charge either in
exercise of jurisdiction under Section 397
or Section 482 of the Code or together, as
the case
scope of
jurisdiction under these two provisions i.e.
Section 397 and Section 482 of the Code
and the fine line of jurisdictional distinction ... quashing of charge either in
exercise of jurisdiction under Section 397
or Section 482 of the Code or together, as
the case
scope of
jurisdiction under these two provisions i.e.
Section 397 and Section 482 of the Code
and the fine line of jurisdictional distinction ... quashing of charge either in
exercise of jurisdiction under Section 397
or Section 482 of the Code or together, as
the case
scope of jurisdiction under these two provisions,
i.e., Section 397 and Section 482 of the Code and the fine line of
jurisdictional distinction ... quashing of charge either in exercise of jurisdiction under
Section 397 or Section 482 of the Code or together, as the case