Section 397 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 397 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
397. Robbery, or dacoity, with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt.—
If, at the time
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 25104 (5.89 seconds)Dilawar Singh vs State Of Delhi on 5 September, 2007
affirming his conviction for offences
punishable under Sections 452 , 392 and 397 of the Indian
Penal Code, 1860 (in short the ' IPC ... mandate of Section 304 Cr.P.C. has been
clearly violated. In any event, the ingredients of Section 397
IPC have not been
Ashfaq vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 10 December, 2003
Shahid (A-2) for
charges under Section 452 IPC, Section 392 IPC and Section 397 IPC read
with Section ... Section 34 of the Penal Code
was permissible and that the necessary ingredient, to attract Section 397
of the Penal Code was also said
Dharminder Singh @ Sonu vs State Of Punjab on 31 August, 2013
been convicted for the
offence punishable under Section 395 read with Section 397 of the
Indian Penal Code (' IPC ' - for short ... fine of Rs.5000/- for
the offence under Section 395 read with Section 397 IPC.
The FIR (Ex.PD/1) has been registered
Ram Ratan vs State Of M.P. on 17 December, 2021
alias Rajendra under
Section 392 and 397 of Indian Penal Code (“ IPC ” for
short) read with Section 11 / 13 of Madhya Pradesh
Dakaiti ... necessary to
bring the offender within the ambit of Section
397 of the Penal Code.”
(Emphasis supplied)
15. Further, in Dilawar Singh vs. State
State Of Maharashtra vs Vinayak Tukaram Utekar And Another on 30 January, 1997
397 , I.P.C. or the impugned order convicting him under Sections 379 and 324 , I.P.C. and releasing him u/S. 360 , ... elements of an offence u/S. 394 , I.P.C. are included in the offence u/S. 397 , I.P.C. Both of them contemplate
Seetal vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 8 August, 2014
Section 397 of the Penal Code.‖ The Court chose to give identical
meaning to the word ‗uses' in Section 397 IPC ... convicted even
on the principle of constructive liability under Section 34 read with
Section 397 IPC. Further, it was argued that the evidence
Raj Kumar @ Mota @ Ganja @ Sonu @ Shankar & ... vs The State Of Haryana on 27 September, 2013
Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra, who framed charge
under Section 392 IPC, read with Section 397 IPC, under Section
394 IPC ... rigorous imprisonment for
three years for commission of offence punishable under Section
397 I.P.C.
Anjal Gupta
2013.10.24 16:26
I attest
Ghanshyam @ Bablu vs State on 5 December, 2009
been made out against the appellant under Section 392
IPC, but not under Section 397 IPC. The basis of this contention ... appellant for the offences under Section 392 IPC, the
conviction of the appellant under Section 397 IPC is hereby set aside
Sanjay Shankar Swami @ Sanjay Kumar vs State (Nct) Of Delhi on 30 April, 2013
have been convicted for offences punishable
under Section 392 read with Sections 34 IPC and 397 IPC and the order ... under Section 397 IPC. No separate sentence was
awarded for offence under Section 392 IPC as Section 397 covers Section