Section 399 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 399 in The Companies Act, 1956
399. Right to apply under sections 397 and 398.-(1) The following members of a company shall have
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14211 (3.85 seconds)Section 399 in The Companies Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
399 in The Companies Act, 2013
399. Inspection, production and evidence of documents kept by Registrar.—
(1) Save as otherwise provided elsewhere in this Act ... this Act, or making a record of any fact required or authorised to be recorded or registered in pursuance of this Act, on payment
Mohan Lal Mittal And Ors. vs Universal Wires Ltd. And Ors. on 30 October, 1979
making an application under Sections 397-398 of the Companies Act, 1956, to be a valid consent within Section 399 . He also referred to Forms ... present application under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, is not maintainable as the requisite qualification under Section 399 of the Companies
Universal Music India Ltd. And Anr. vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 7 September, 2006
Clause (b) of Section 237 are similar to the words used in Sub-section (4) of Section 399 of the Companies Act ... section 4 of Section 399 .
(v) The provisions of Section 399 do not provide protection to the company. A company is constituted by its members
+Shankar Sundaram vs $1.Amalgamations Ltd on 3 June, 2002
section 398 of the Companies Act. He referred to section 402 of the
Companies Act and submitted that the ambit of powers of the Company ... parent company an
subsidiary company, and the Calcutta High Court has adverted to
neither the provisions of section 399 of the Companies Act
Sri Krishna Tiles & Potteries (Madras) ... vs The Company Law Board And Ors. on 26 May, 1978
section (1) of Section 399 is removed by an authorisation issued under sub-section (4) of Section 399 and not that a protection afforded ... Companies Act , for example, clause (b) of Section 237 of the Companies Act. Under Section 237 of the Companies Act the Central Government, inter alia
K.N. Sankaranarayanan And Another vs Shree Consultations And Services Pvt. ... on 28 January, 1994
said that the company petition herein has been validly presented.
11. Under section 399(3) of the Companies Act, any shareholder entitled to make ... petition based on section 399 of the Act. He further held that compliance with section 399 of the Act should be at the time
V.L. Sridharan vs Econo Valves Pvt on 19 July, 2010
competent to maintain the company petition under section 397 of the Companies Act, as per the requirements of section 399(1) and majority of shares ... file company petition under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. In my considered view, that should be the construction of section 399
Amalgamations Limited vs Shankar Sundaram on 7 September, 2011
Section 399 of the Act. Therefore, there is a qualification rider in Section 397 to apply to the satisfaction of Section 399 of the Act ... imposed in Section 397 of the Act, as contemplated under Section 399 (4) of the Act. In so far as subsidiary company is concerned
Shankar Sundaram vs Amalgamations Ltd., Chennai, A. ... on 3 June, 2002
section 398 of the Companies Act. He referred to section 402 of the Companies Act and submitted that the ambit of powers of the Company ... company and not in the subsidiary company, and the Calcutta High Court has adverted to neither the provisions of section 399 of the Companies Act