Police
Eathapur Police Station
Salem District Respondent
Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 read with Section 401
Cr.P.C. seeking to set aside ... Courts below, the
accused is before this Court under Section 397 read with Section 401
Cr.P.C.
3 Heard Mr. A. Balamurugan, learned counsel
Petitioner
vs.
R. Manivannan @ Manivannan Raman Respondent
Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 r/w Section 401 Cr.P.C.,
seeking to call ... Courts below, the accused has preferred the present criminal
revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C.
5 Heard Mr. B. Harikrishnan
7507 of 2019 in Crl.R.C. No.871 of 2017)
Criminal Revisions filed under Section 397 read with Section 401
Cr.P.C. seeking ... Section 395 to Section 401 CrPC, read together, do not indicate
that the revisional power of the High Court can be exercised
Branch,
Coimbatore.
(Cr.No.3 of 2005) .. Respondent
Criminal Revision preferred under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. to
set aside the judgment dated ... with the above limited purpose. The provisions contained
in Section 395 to Section 401 CrPC, read together, do not
indicate that the revisional
Police,
Kichipalayam Police Station,
Salem. .. Respondent/
Complainant
Criminal Revision preferred under Section 397 read with 401
Cr.P.C . challenging the judgment and order dated ... with the above limited purpose. The provisions
contained in Section 395 to Section 401 CrPC, read together,
do not indicate that the revisional
2008) Respondent
Prayer in Crl.R.C. No.1176 of 2018:
Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C.
seeking ... Sessions Case.
Prayer in Crl.R.C. No.1244 of 2018:
Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C.
seeking
petition invoking the revisional
jurisdiction of this Court under Section 397 IPC r/w 401 Cr.P.C.
6.Heard Mr.K.S.Rajagopalan, learned ... with the above limited purpose. The provisions contained
in Section 395 to Section 401 CrPC, read together, do not indicate
that the revisional
Chengam Police Station,
Chengam,
Tiruvannamalai District. .. Respondent/
Complainant
Criminal Revision preferred under Section 397 read with 401
Cr.P.C . challenging the judgment and order ... with the above limited purpose. The provisions contained
in Section 395 to Section 401 CrPC, read together, do not
indicate that the revisional
Petitioner/
Accused
Vs
S.K.Subramaniam .. Respondent/
Complainant
Criminal Revision preferred under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. to
set aside the judgment ... with the above limited purpose. The provisions contained
in Section 395 to Section 401 CrPC, read together, do not
indicate that the revisional
Petitioner/
Accused
Vs
R.V.Rangasamy .. Respondent/
Complainant
Criminal Revision preferred under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. to set
aside the judgment ... with the above limited purpose. The provisions contained
in Section 395 to Section 401 CrPC, read together, do not indicate
that the revisional
