Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 3791 (2.00 seconds)

Sukhbir Jain And Anr. vs State on 26 May, 1992

Sushma and Nisha for the offences punishable Under Section 498A and Section 406 IPC. 4. The concerned Metropolitan Magistrate before whom the challan ... Sushma, the unmarried teenaged sisters-in-law either under Section 406 or Section 498A IPC and they were ordered to be discharged
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 43 - Full Document

) Sh. Arun Kumar Jain vs State on 9 May, 2014

Accused Arun was convicted under Section 325 IPC and conviction was converted by Sessions Court under Section 335 IPC. He further argued ... Section 313 Cr.P.C, therefore, the trial court could not have concluded that such demand was ever made by accused. Ingredients of Section 406
Delhi District Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next