Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 747 (1.75 seconds)

State vs Nadeem Khan on 16 September, 2023

DLSE020054212023 FIR No. -: 597/2022 Police Station -: Sarita Vihar Section(s) -: 380/382/457/411 IPC In the matter of - STATE VS. Nadeem ... Pronouncement :- 16.09.2023 9. Final Order :- Conviction u/s 380 / 451 IPC Acquittal u/s 382 / 411 IPC FIR No. 597/2022
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . on 30 June, 2023

DLSE020021122015 FIR No. -: 696/2015 Police Station -: Sarita Vihar Section(s) -: 380/454/411 IPC In the matter of - STATE VS. JAI SIYA ... Pronouncement :- 30.06.2023 9. Final Order :- Conviction u/s 380 / 454 IPC Acquittal u/s 411 IPC. JUDGMENT BRIEF STATEMENT OF REASONS
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Haidar Ali on 21 November, 2023

trial for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 356 / 379 / 411 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC ... compounded between the parties and statutory acquittal u/s 379 / 411 IPC was announced in favor of accused. FIR No. 542/2020 State
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Paras Gogia on 3 August, 2023

trial for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 356 / 379 / 411 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC ... compounded between the parties and statutory acquittal u/s 379 / 411 IPC was announced in favor of accused. 7. Thereafter, prosecution was called
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Dinesh on 16 September, 2023

trial for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 356 / 379 / 411 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC ... compounded between the parties and statutory acquittal u/s 379 / 411 IPC was announced in favor of accused. 7. Thereafter, prosecution was called
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Sanjay on 9 November, 2023

accused persons in Section 411 IPC. However, witness failed to identify both the accused in Section 392 / 34 IPC. c) That ... witnesses are essential. d) That, without examination of recovery witnesses, acquittal u/s 411 IPC is not proper in the eyes
Delhi District Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next