Acit 25(2), Mumbai vs Itd Itd Cem Jv, Mumbai on 10 October, 2018
deleting the disallowance the
administrative expenses of Rs. 1,58,53,457/-
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 663 (1.03 seconds)Digital Electronics Ltd, Mumbai vs Jcit (Osd) Rg 8(1), Mumbai on 18 November, 2016
Commissioner
(Appeals) -16, Mumbai and arises out of the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c)
of the Income ... after making
disallowance of Rs.3,49,457/- u/s 14A and a further addition of
Rs.2,10,75,000/- under the head
Acc Ltd., Mumbai vs Dcit(Ltu) - 1, Mumbai on 28 February, 2023
Acc Ltd., Mumbai vs Dcit(Ltu) - 1, Mumbai on 28 February, 2023
IN THE INCOME
Isc Speciality Chemicals Llp ,Mumbai vs Ito Ward 19(1)(5), Mumbai on 28 May, 2025
claiming of exemption
under section 47(xiiib) . Therefore, where exemption under
Section 47(xiiib) has not been claimed application of Section ... purpose of sub-
section (1) of section 12B of the Act. If the language of sub-section
(1) of section
Dcit 2(2), Mumbai vs Larsen & Toubro Ltd, Mumbai on 15 March, 2024
reasons.
(d) Reduction of profits in respect of projects eligible for deduction
u/s. 80HHB of the Act.
24. We find that this issue ... assessee has claimed deduction of Rs.23,93,457/- u/s. 80HHE of the
Act .In ground No.7 of appeal assessee has assailed computation
Larsen & Toubro Ltd, Mumbai vs Asst Cit Rg 2(2), Mumbai on 15 March, 2024
reasons.
(d) Reduction of profits in respect of projects eligible for deduction
u/s. 80HHB of the Act.
24. We find that this issue ... assessee has claimed deduction of Rs.23,93,457/- u/s. 80HHE of the
Act .In ground No.7 of appeal assessee has assailed computation
Welspun Steel Ltd, Mumbai vs Dcit Cen Cir 3(3), Mumbai on 17 January, 2020
such disallowance to t 33,64,08,457/- by way of adding
back disallowance made u/s. 14A r.w.r.SD and thereby erred ... with the raising the addition in sum of
Rs.33,64,08,457/- u/s 14A r.w. Rule 8D of the Rules on account
Mahatma Gandhi Seva Mandir, Mumbai vs Assessee on 9 April, 2012
learned CIT(A) erred in upholding the
disallowance of Rs.3,06,457/- u/s 40(a(ia) disregarding the
fact that the appellant ... profession" under Section
28. The exception in Section 40 is carved out, only for the purpose of
Section 28 and not for computing
Rushabh Precision Bearings, Mumbai vs Acit - 7(2), Mumbai on 12 December, 2023
with provisions
pertaining to winding up by the Court. As per section 457(1)(a) of the
Companies Act, 1956, Liquidator shall have the power ... 3270/Mum/2018
A.Y. 2003-04
Rushabh Precision Bearings
envisaged u/s 457(1a) of the Companies Act,1956. Thus, we note that
Oman International Bank S.A.O.G., ... vs Assessee on 5 September, 2013
allow assessee's claim for
deduction u/s. 37 of The Act of Rs.17,59,457/- representing
travelling expenses of head office personnel ... Assessee and directed AO to allow deduction of
Rs.17,59,457/- u/s. 37 of the Act.
2.1 At the time of hearing