Section 472 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 472 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
472. Making or possessing counterfeit seal, etc., with intent to commit forgery punishable under section
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 4693 (2.48 seconds)Jacob Mathew vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 5 August, 2005
offence under Section 304A read with Section 34 of the
Indian Penal Code (for short "the IPC ") was registered ... medical professionals
on a pedestal different from ordinary mortals. The Indian Penal Code
enacted as far back as in the year 1860 sets
Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam vs The State Of Bihar on 8 February, 2022
498A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter
referred to as ‘ IPC ’). The High Court vide order impugned ... written complaint for registration of FIR under sections 341 , 323 , 379 ,
354 , 498A read with Section 34 IPC against her husband
Sanjay Dutt vs State Of Maharashtra Tr.Cbi,Bombay on 21 March, 2013
thereby committed offences punishable under Section 3(3) of TADA (P)
Act, 1987 and Section 120-B of IPC read with Sections ... Indian Penal Code and
offences under Sections 3 and 7 read with Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a)
of the Arms
Satvir Singh And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 27 September, 2001
fine. It is a unique legal
phenomenon in the Indian Penal Code that the only act, the
attempt of which alone will become ... linking it with
Section 306 or with Section 304B. Hence the conviction and
sentence passed on them under Section 116 IPC
State Of Nct Of Delhi vs Sanjay on 4 September, 2014
under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking
quashing of the FIR registered at Police Station Alipur under Sections
379 / 114 / 120B / 34 IPC ... Section
379 of the Indian Penal Code. Cognizance can be taken under section 190 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Cognizance
Rakesh Kumar Paul vs State Of Assam on 16 August, 2017
Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act ) and the Indian Penal Code , 1860 ( IPC ).
Although the petitioner was not named ... Section 167(2) CrPC the imprisonment should be for a clear period of
10 years or more.”
This is factually incorrect, inasmuch as Section
M. Karunanidhi vs Union Of India on 20 February, 1979
Penal Code
( sections 5(2) and 5(1) (d) of the Corruption Act and
section 161 of the Indian Penal Code).
It may, however ... Indian Penal Code
and, therefore, there can be no question of section 5
(1) (c) repealing section 405 of the Indian Penal Code
Japani Sahoo vs Chandra Sekhar Mohanty on 27 July, 2007
offences punishable under Sections 294 and
323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred
to as ' IPC ... limitation under Section 468 of the Code. The learned
Magistrate had not condoned delay by exercising power
under Section 473 of the Code and hence
Namdeo vs State Of Maharashtra on 13 March, 2007
appellant for an offence punishable under Section 302 of
Indian Penal Code ( IPC ).
Short facts leading to the present appeal ... report, offence vide Crime
No. 94 of 2000 was registered under Section 302 IPC. PSI
Diwakar himself took over the investigation