ingredients of section 375 IPC punishable under Section
376 IPC to demonstrate whether the conviction of the
appellant under Sections 376 / 511 IPC is sustainable ... committed squarely covers the ingredients of
Sections 366 and 354 IPC. The appellant was charged
under Sections 376 / 511 IPC but on invoking the
provisions
foung
guilty of commission of offence under Section 376(2) (f) read with Section
511 of the IPC. He was sentenced to 10 years rigorous ... made. That being the position,
conviction is altered from Section 376 IPC to Section 376 / 511 IPC."
Yet again in Aman Kumar
police
station and a case was registered under Section 376 read
with Sections 511 and 307 , IPC. PW-9, doctor intimated
to the Judicial Magistrate ... deceased which found
corroboration by the statement of PW-2.
Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is an
exception to the general rule
u/s 25 / 54 / 59 Arms Act read with
section 5 TADA Act P.S. Sadar Kaithal.
6. FIR No.147 dt. 25.4.91 ... u/s 323 / 324 / 148 / 149 IPC PS
Garhi.
9. FIR No.277 dt. 25.6.2001 u/s 332 / 353 / 225 / 186 / 511 IPC
PS City
Excise Rules,
1944 read with the proviso of sub-
section (1) to Section 11A of the
Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944.
b) Penalties should ... 511 (Del.). Contention of
the assessee that the cause of action for invoking
Section 11-A would accrue only from the relevant
date defined under
511, (2006) 3 ICC 345, 2006 BOM LR 2 1303, (2006) 2 WLC(SC)CVL 38, MANU/SC/1686/2006, (2007) 1 CIVLJ ... order of
the learned single Judge dismissing the appellants' application
under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 as being barred
Section 83(1)(a) of the Act. It was, however, not
necessary to 'set forth full particulars', which is the
requirement of Section ... amended or amplified under Section 86 of the act, in
the instant case, Clause (b) of Section 83(1) had no
application and the petition
Court upholding
the conviction of the appellant for an offence punishable under
Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ... appeal before the High Court which was
numbered as Criminal Appeal No. 511 of 1997. Initially by
order dated 30.4.1998 a Division Bench
State Of Haryana on 19 April, 2006
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2006 SC 511
Author: Arijit Pasayat
Bench: Arijit Pasayat , S.H. Kapadia
CASE NO.:
Appeal ... convicted the
appellants and one Dharam Singh for offence punishable
under Section 304 Part I read with Section 34 of the Indian
Penal Code
SUPREME 463, (2006) 8 SCALE 370, (2006) 56 ALLCRIC 511, (2006) 3 CHANDCRIC 190, (2006) 4 ALLCRILR 691, 2006 CRILR ... Criminal Appeal No. 51-SP/1998 whereby his conviction and sentence under Sections 376 and 506 IPC has been upheld. The appellant was sentenced
