Section 54A in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 54A in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
54A. [ Identification of person arrested [Inserted by Act 25 of 2005, Section
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 1194 (1.09 seconds)Patan Jamal Vali vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 27 April, 2021
evidence, the
appellant was examined under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973. By a judgment dated 19 February 2013 the Special Judge ... suggestions translated into changes in the Indian Penal
Code and the Criminal Procedure Code . Some key changes were as follows:
(i) When the victim
Mukesh Singh vs The State (Nct Of Delhi) on 24 August, 2023
statement of the appellant convict under Section
313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ( CrPC ) was
recorded in which the appellant convict ... Emphasis supplied]
33
SECTION 54A OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE, 1973
29. In the aforesaid context, we shall now look into
Section
Thufail. M. H vs National Investigation Agency (Nia) on 17 July, 2023
Articles 226 and 227 of
Constitution of India read with 482 of Cr.P.C ., praying to set
aside the order dated 13/03/2023 ... order dated 13.3.2023 passed on an application under
section 54A of Cr.P.C. and the consequent test
identification parade (TIP).
2. We have heard
Babitha Surendran vs State Rep By on 31 January, 2004
Tambaram Police Station
Chennai 600 045. .. Respondent
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for the entire records ... prosecuting the offenders since then. Initially we had the Code of Criminal Procedure 1861, followed by 1872, 1882, 1898 and now we have
Ram Suresh And Ors. vs State Of U.P. on 7 November, 2023
Pawan Kumar for the offence under Sections 363 / 366 IPC read with Section 34 IPC as there is no evidence to prove the said charges ... evidence to prove the charges under Sections 363 , 366 IPC read with Section 34 IPC against first set of appellants.
We may in this context
Shrikantgouda S/O Parvatagouda @ ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 September, 2017
NAIK &
SRI PRAVEEN K.UPPAR, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/SEC.374(2) OF
CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE ... ought to have followed
the procedure as contemplated under Section 119 of
Indian Evidence Act, which procedure is not followed in
this case, which vitiates
Shri. Fulbabu Ray vs The State Of Nagaland And Anr on 11 February, 2026
Longkumer, J)
The instant appeal under Section 374 of the Criminal Procedure Code,
1973 has been preferred by the appellant assailing the impugned
judgment dated ... criminal law
when two views are possible, benefit of doubt is to be given to the
accused.
20. The Section 164 CrPC statement
Shri. Fulbabu Ray vs The State Of Nagaland And Anr on 11 February, 2026
Longkumer, J)
The instant appeal under Section 374 of the Criminal Procedure Code,
1973 has been preferred by the appellant assailing the impugned
judgment dated ... criminal law
when two views are possible, benefit of doubt is to be given to the
accused.
20. The Section 164 CrPC statement
Shri. Fulbabu Ray vs The State Of Nagaland And Anr on 11 February, 2026
Longkumer, J)
The instant appeal under Section 374 of the Criminal Procedure Code,
1973 has been preferred by the appellant assailing the impugned
judgment dated ... criminal law
when two views are possible, benefit of doubt is to be given to the
accused.
20. The Section 164 CrPC statement