CDRs.
They could not constitute legal evidence as the certificate
required under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act
has not been filed ... have been rendered
meaningless with no proper certification under Section
65B of the Indian Evidence Act in this case.
65. True it is that
CDRs.
They could not constitute legal evidence as the certificate
required under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act
has not been filed ... have been rendered
meaningless with no proper certification under Section
65B of the Indian Evidence Act in this case.
65. True it is that
CDRs.
They could not constitute legal evidence as the certificate
required under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act
has not been filed ... have been rendered
meaningless with no proper certification under Section
65B of the Indian Evidence Act in this case.
65. True it is that
CDRs.
They could not constitute legal evidence as the certificate
required under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act
has not been filed ... have been rendered
meaningless with no proper certification under Section
65B of the Indian Evidence Act in this case.
65. True it is that
CDRs.
They could not constitute legal evidence as the certificate
required under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act
has not been filed ... have been rendered
meaningless with no proper certification under Section
65B of the Indian Evidence Act in this case.
65. True it is that
CDRs.
They could not constitute legal evidence as the certificate
required under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act
has not been filed ... have been rendered
meaningless with no proper certification under Section
65B of the Indian Evidence Act in this case.
65. True it is that
CDRs.
They could not constitute legal evidence as the certificate
required under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act
has not been filed ... have been rendered
meaningless with no proper certification under Section
65B of the Indian Evidence Act in this case.
65. True it is that
CDRs.
They could not constitute legal evidence as the certificate
required under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act
has not been filed ... have been rendered
meaningless with no proper certification under Section
65B of the Indian Evidence Act in this case.
65. True it is that
proved as a secondary piece of
evidence with necessary certification under Section 65B
of the Indian Evidence Act. Since the seizure memo also
Mishra. We have not been able to lay our
hands on any evidence which would certify that it
belonged to the appellants. Investigation papers
however ... admissible piece
of evidence in the absence of the requirements under
Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 having
been complied with [refer
