prosecuted under Section 68(1) of the
Act, is the person who is liable to be prosecuted under
Section 68(1) , is a question that ... Section (1) specifies Section 56 , sub-section (2) ropes in a
proceeding for adjudication of penalty as well and in
Section 68
Modi Xerox Ltd.
for contravention of Section 8(3) read with
Section 8(4) and Section 68 of FERA, 1973, I
also find the other ... indicates that sub-section (1) and sub-section
(2) of Section 141 are pari materia to Section 68 of FERA,
1973 which was already
provisions/ sections of FERA are not restricted
in its application. Thus though Section 140 of the Act appears to be
identical to Section 68 ... particularly with regard to Section 140 of the Act and Section 68 of
FERA. The penalty which is imposed under Section
next proposes to deal with the issue whether in terms
of Section 68 FERA, proceedings under FERA could be maintained
against the Appellants notwithstanding that ... thereafter.
24. The net result is that for the purposes of Section 68 FERA
although the contravention if at all was by OEPL, there were
provisions/ sections of FERA are not restricted
in its application. Thus though Section 140 of the Act appears to be
identical to Section 68 ... particularly with regard to Section 140 of the Act and Section 68 of
FERA. The penalty which is imposed under Section
provisions/ sections of FERA are not restricted
in its application. Thus though Section 140 of the Act appears to be
identical to Section 68 ... particularly with regard to Section 140 of the Act and Section 68 of
FERA. The penalty which is imposed under Section
provisions/ sections of FERA are not restricted
in its application. Thus though Section 140 of the Act appears to be
identical to Section 68 ... particularly with regard to Section 140 of the Act and Section 68 of
FERA. The penalty which is imposed under Section
Section 56 of FERA
and its employees become vicariously liable for the alleged acts of the said
Company under Section 56 read with Section 68 ... petitioners employees and commission of alleged
offence under Section 56 read with Section 68 of FERA.
13. Ld. Sr. Counsel further submitted that the respondent
Section 56 of FERA
and its employees become vicariously liable for the alleged acts of the said
Company under Section 56 read with Section 68 ... petitioners employees and commission of alleged
offence under Section 56 read with Section 68 of FERA.
13. Ld. Sr. Counsel further submitted that the respondent
next proposes to deal with the issue whether in terms
of Section 68 FERA, proceedings under FERA could be maintained
against the Appellants notwithstanding that ... thereafter.
24. The net result is that for the purposes of Section 68 FERA
although the contravention if at all was by OEPL, there were
