Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1469 (2.13 seconds)

R. Vasudevan vs Cbi on 1 June, 2012

Bench: M.L. Mehta * THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1281/2012 Date of Decision: 01.06.2012 R. Vasudevan ..... Petitioner Through ... tried together. It was further submitted that right under Section 31 Cr.P.C. and Section 71 IPC would be prejudiced if the petitioner
Delhi High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - M L Mehta - Full Document

State vs . Rahis & Others on 4 August, 2012

carried on with the investigation and examined witnesses under S.161 Cr.P.C. Such practice, to say the least, should ... Prosecution case is that accused Rahis, Jaspal and Rashid had hatched a criminal conspiracy to print fake currency notes and for that purpose they
Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Tasleem @ Hattu on 26 May, 2012

case of the prosecution as unfolded by the report u/s 173 Cr.P.C is as under:­ That on 25.08.2008 complainant Shamsuddin ... IPC are exclusively triable by the Court of Session, therefore, after compliance of the provisions of Section 207 Cr.P.C, the case was committed
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Ache Lal on 9 November, 2012

case of the prosecution as unfolded by the report u/s 173 Cr.P.C is as under:­ That on 09.06.2009 on receipt ... IPC is exclusively triable by the Court of Session, therefore, after compliance of the provisions of Section 207 Cr.P.C, the case was committed
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next