Section 79 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 79 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
79. Act done by a person justified, or by mistake of fact believing himself justified
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 37412 (4.92 seconds)Shah Rukh Khan vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 20 August, 2007
Chokkappa (1972) 2 Supreme Court Cases 680.
8. Fourthly, Section 79 IPC creates an exception in favor of the Petitioner. The learned Magistrate has failed ... considering the application Under Section 245 (2) of the Code, the learned Magistrate has brushed aside the benefit of Section 79 of IPC. However, even
Raj Kapoor vs Laxman on 14 December, 1979
offence, Section 292 I.P.C. notwithstanding. The absolution is based upon the combined operation of Section 5A of the Act and Section 79 ... legal effect of the combined operation of Section 5A of the Act and Section 79 I.P.C. But we will assume for purposes
Rajkapoor S/O Prithviraj Kapoor vs Laxman S/O Kishanlal Gavai on 14 December, 1979
Justified'-Meaning of- Indian Penal
Code 1860, S.79
HEADNOTE:
Section 79 I.P.C. provides that nothing is an offence
which is done ... display thereafter, and by virtue of
the antidotal provisions in section 79 I.P.C., the public
exhibition, circulation or distribution of the film, even
Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra & Anr. vs Govt Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr. on 2 January, 2013
film.
EFFECT OF CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY CBFC : SECTION 5-A OF THE
CINEMATOGRAPH ACT AND SECTION 79 IPC CONSTITUTE AN
EXPRESS LEGAL ... released in theatres after it was issued a valid
certificate by CBFC. Sections 5-A and 5-B(2) of The Cinematograph
State vs Mohd Sabeer on 24 March, 2026
cruelty likely to cause unnecessary mental or physical suffering.
18. Section 79 JJ Act, 2015 (Exploitation of child employee)
The prosecution must show ... omission assumes critical importance, particularly for offences
under Section 370 IPC, Section 374 IPC, Section 79 of the JJ Act,
and Sections
Mohd. Hashim Masood vs State on 30 September, 1999
offence punishable under Section 420 IPC, under Section 63
of the Copyright Act and under Sections 78 / 79 of the Trade Mark and Merch-
andise ... committed by the petitioner under Section 420 IPC, under
Section 63 of the Copyright Act and under Sections 78 / 79 of the Trade Mark
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958
BOMBAY PRESIDENCY
India
Bombay Tenancy and
Ramji Pandey vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors. on 11 May, 1981
crime No. 250/71 under Section 177/452, I.P.C.
(7) M.C.R. No. Section 109/79, Section ... Section 192/79, Sec-Won 323/504, I.P.C.
(9) M.C.R. No. Section 262, Section
Dvb Group Merchant Bank (Asia) Ltd vs M. V. Malaviya Twenty Three Imo No ... on 19 May, 2020
Dvb Group Merchant Bank (Asia) Ltd vs M. V. Malaviya Twenty Three Imo No ... on