4. Whether Order Is To Be Circulated To ... vs Unknown on 31 July, 2013
evident from Rule 3 of the Adjudicating Rules framed under Section 79 of the FERA that Rules of Procedure do not apply to adjudication proceedings
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 165 (0.02 seconds)4. Whether Order Is To Be Circulated To ... vs Unknown on 31 July, 2013
evident from Rule 3 of the Adjudicating Rules framed under Section 79 of the FERA that Rules of Procedure do not apply to adjudication proceedings
Shri Mehulbhai Rasikbhai Raithatha vs Rajkot on 6 August, 2024
evident
from Rule 3 of the Adjudicating Rules framed under Section 79 of the FERA
that Rules of Procedure do not apply to adjudication proceedings
4. Whether Order Is To Be Circulated To ... vs Shri Sunil N. Gupta on 31 July, 2013
evident from Rule 3 of the Adjudicating Rules framed under Section 79 of the FERA that Rules of Procedure do not apply to adjudication proceedings
Lic Housing Finance Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Service Tax Mumbai-I on 21 August, 2019
Lic Housing Finance Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Service Tax Mumbai-I on 21 August, 2019
V S Bhagwati Shipping vs Commissioner, Customs-New Delhi ... on 24 January, 2025
purported to be issued by an
officer is correctly issued. Section 79 of the Evidence Act, 1872
requires even Courts to presume that every certificate
Ambe Freights Pvt Ltd vs New Delhi -Airport And General on 30 April, 2024
issued as per
6
2021 (276) ELT 649 (T-Del.)
10
Section 79 of the Evidence Act. The grant of IEC presupposes verification
of facts ... purported to be issued by an officer is
correctly issued. Section 79 of the Evidence Act, 1872
requires even Courts to presume that every certificate
Jagruti G Shah vs Cc (C.S.I. Airport) Mumbai on 7 May, 2025
POST, COURIER AND STORES
Baggage
"Declaration by owner of baggage.
Section 77 . The owner of any baggage shall, for the purpose of clearing ... made in respect of such baggage under section 77 .
Bona fide baggage exempted from duty.
Section 79 . (1) The proper officer may, subject
Divisional Railway Manager vs Cce & St, Allahabad on 7 October, 2013
mandated by the provisions of the Constitution ( Article 300 ) and Section 79 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 as well, that wherever a suit
East West Freight Carriers Pvt. Ltd vs Mumbai on 13 March, 2012
Regulation) Act, 1962 and under section 111(m) of the Customs Act;
(2) Impose penalties under section ... fine totaling Rs. 3,79,500/-. Penalty equivalent to duty evaded was imposed on the 6 importers under section 114A of the Customs Act. Penalties