Cbi vs 1 Ram Singh on 17 January, 2018
Cbi vs 1 Ram Singh on 17 January, 2018
IN THE COURT OF MANOJ JAIN
Search Results Page
Search Results
291 - 300 of 669 (0.83 seconds)Mahesh S. Mehta vs Harini Co-Op Hsg Soc. Ltd & Ors on 3 July, 2009
present petition cannot
be granted u/s 17 of the Act, the Petitioner have invoke section 9 of the Act in this
background.
6. Respondents ... have filed dispute u/s
91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act (for short MCS Act ) against
Respondent No.1 and the same
Reliance Industries Limited, Mumbai vs Acit , Mumbai on 8 March, 2022
Reliance Industries Limited, Mumbai vs Acit , Mumbai on 8 March, 2022
ITA Nos.1645 &
Acit, New Delhi vs M/S. North Delhi Power Ltd. (Now Tata ... on 1 January, 2016
seen from the records that the regular assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act
had already been done in the case of the asseseee ... profit
and loss account. Later, the AO issued notice u/s 148 of the Act dated 28th March,
2011 and the reasons recorded
Cipla Ltd vs The Competent Authority And The ... on 22 April, 2021
parking spaces for
a total consideration of Rs.33,91,84,000/- and Rs.34,79,60,000/-.
5. It is the case ... August 2016, the
respondent no.5 executed and registered a declaration under Section 2
of the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970 (for short
Credit Lyonnais , vs Department Of Income Tax on 22 May, 2013
Revenue for the consequential
disallowance u/s 14A of Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also
called as `the Act') but subsequently abandoned because ... action of the A.O. in levying interest of 91,22,475 u/s 234D
of the Act. This issue is no more
Nitesh vs State on 3 February, 2012
section merely
because the evidence supports the case for
the prosecution and not that of the accused.
The section is a general section which applies ... Court. Sections 60 , 64
and 91 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in
short ' Evidence Act ') are based on this rule
In Re: Legend Technologies (India) ... vs Unknown on 15 February, 2008
91 to show that any directorial complaints can be entertained in a Section 397 petition in cases of family companies and in companies ... Act. Section 190 read with Section 225 neither expressly nor by implication overrides the requirement of Section 188 of the Act. Sections
Discussion Before The Apex Court In ... vs . on 27 April, 2012
Singhal Page No.29/70
30
31. Section 13(1)(e) of the PC Act provides as under:
(e) if he or any person ... 91 : 2007 Cri.L.J. 2929, the
conditions essential to bring a case u/section Section 13 ( 1 )(
e ) of the PC Act were
Krishnamurthy vs . State Of Karnataka, (2005) 4 on 23 May, 2017
offence under Section 13(2) read with Section
13(1)(e) of the PC Act.
Page: 59/323
91. The sanction order