borrower), aggrieved by any of the measures referred in sub section (4) of Section 13 taken by the secured creditor or its authorised officer ... been made. Writ petitioners have not challenged Section 13(4) possession notice. As per Section 13(4)(a) of the Act, in case the borrower
contention of the petitioner that though a representation/objection dated 22.09.2016 under Section 13(3A) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, has been sent ... such representation/objection, the respondent bank/secured creditor has taken action under Section 13(4) of the said Act and therefore left with no other
borrower), aggrieved by any of the measures referred in sub section (4) of Section 13 taken by the secured creditor or its authorised officer ... been made. Writ petitioners have not challenged Section 13(4) possession notice. As per Section 13(4)(a) of the Act, in case the borrower
495 of 2014, registered against the driver of the appellant-Transport Corporation, for the offences, under Sections
495 of 2014, registered against the driver of the appellant-Transport Corporation, for the offences, under Sections
495 of 2014, registered against the driver of the appellant-Transport Corporation, for the offences, under Sections
495 of 2014, registered against the driver of the appellant-Transport Corporation, for the offences, under Sections
challenge the action of the financial institution by filing necessary petition under Section 17 , the petitioner is not entitled to invoke the writ jurisdiction ... United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon and others ) III (2010) BC 495 (SC) = 2010-5-L.W. 193, wherein in para
challenge the action of the financial institution by filing necessary petition under Section 17 , the petitioner is not entitled to invoke the writ jurisdiction ... United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon and others ) III (2010) BC 495 (SC) = 2010-5-L.W. 193, wherein in para
challenge the action of the financial institution by filing necessary petition under Section 17 , the petitioner is not entitled to invoke the writ jurisdiction ... United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon and others ) III (2010) BC 495 (SC) = 2010-5-L.W. 193, wherein in para
