stated
that he had handed over cheques in question as blank signed cheques for
the purpose of security as he had to purchase seven ... demand
draft or alleging that the cheques in question were given as blank
cheques, towards security. No notice was sent by the respondent/accused
complainant did not return it. Later one of the security cheques was
misused and the present complaint was filed. He filed complaint
against complainant ... there was no
necessity of additional security. It was also elicited that the alleged fact
of giving security cheques is not mentioned in mortgage deed
legally
recoverable debt as on presentation of cheques as the
said cheques were only issued as security cheques. The
23 CC No.20034/2011
SCCH ... cheque book only three cheques
were issued and other cheques in question are not
covered but other cheques information is available
statement that
Rs.1,87,00,000/ only covered by the security cheques
but he does not admit and accept the due of amount ... referred to as security deposit means demand for
security deposits from the accused and as per that the
accused given cheques as security which
denying his liability to pay the cheques
amount and contending that the said cheques are only
security cheques and are not issued towards payment ... back side of Ex.P2 and P3 cheques that
those cheques are only security cheques and are not to be
deposited without written confirmation
stated that the cheques in question were only given as a security cheques to
the complainant and since the complainant failed to honour MOUs therefore ... given as a security cheques in
2015. Further even if assuming that the cheques in question were given as security
cheques still that does
never given any security cheque. He also denied the
suggestion that on 04.12.2018, he had taken two blank security cheques from the
accused. He also ... given, but cheques were retained, he immediately would
have protested and asked the cheques to be returned and if
still cheques were not returned
body of cheques in question.
2. I have given cheques in question to some Kanhya Lal, uncle of
complainant as security because ... brother of complainant namely Pankaj Jain and they insisted for
security cheques. Said Pankaj Jain had done work of washing
when asked for cheques , he told him that the cheques had
been misplaced or that the complainant misused the blank cheques of accused for
extortion ... when asked for cheques , he told him that the cheques had
been misplaced or that he has misused the blank cheques of accused for extortion
return the said
cheques, Manoj Kumar told me that the said cheques were not traceable and as and
when the cheques would be traced ... present
complainant by misusing and abusing the blank signed security cheques of the
accused has filed the present false fabricated case in connivance with
