Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 vs M/S Security Printing And Mining ... on 26 September, 2023
Author: Rajiv Shakdher
Bench: Rajiv Shakdher
$~
* IN THE HIGH ... Standing Counsel
with Mr Ashvini Kumar, Standing
Counsel.
versus
M/S SECURITY PRINTING AND MINING CORPORATION OF
INDIA LTD ..... Respondent
Through: Mr Rajiv Tyagi
Ramakant Dixit vs Security Printing And Minting ... on 6 April, 2021
Author: V. Kameswar Rao
Bench: V. Kameswar Rao
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ... Through: Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj and
Mr. Karan Gautam, Advs.
versus
SECURITY PRINTING AND MINTING CORPORATION OF
INDIA LIMITED AND ORS.
..... Respondents
Through
Rotoffset Corporation vs Security Printing And Minting ... on 19 August, 2025
Author: Tushar Rao Gedela
Bench: Tushar Rao Gedela
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ... 11016/2025 & CM APPL.45377/2025
ROTOFFSET CORPORATION ...Petitioner
versus
SECURITY PRINTING AND MINING CORPORATION
OF INDIA LTD. & ORS. ...Respondents
Advocates who appeared
Security Printing And Minting ... vs Shri Ravi Prakash Yadav on 24 April, 2025
Author: Navin Chawla
Bench: Navin Chawla
$~116
* IN THE HIGH COURT ... DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 24.04.2025
+ LPA 268/2025
SECURITY PRINTING AND MINTING CORPORATION
OF INDIA LIMITED (SPMCIL)
.....Appellant
Through: Mr.Kamal Kant
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited &
Anr. , 2001 (59) DRJ 393 (DB)
Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Limited & Anr.
O.M.P. 1113 ... 1113/2012 Page 16 of 23
29. In Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India (supra), the
Supreme Court held that the withdrawal of MODVAT
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited &
Anr. , 2001 (59) DRJ 393 (DB)
Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Limited & Anr.
v. Gandhi Industrial Corporation ... Counsel appearing for CMI seeks to distinguish the
judgment in Security Printing by arguing that the same was a case of
principal to principal
ONGC Vs.
Garware Shipping Corporation Ltd. , 2007 ( 13) SCC 434, Security Printing &
Minting Corporation of India Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Gandhi Industrial
Corporation ... very basis of the
Award is wrong. In the Security Printing case in paragraph 16 it has been held by
the Supreme Court that even
perverse and the very basis of the Award is
wrong. In Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Ltd. and Anr.
Vs. Gandhi Industrial Corporation
Refinery Ltd. v. Daelim
Industrial Co. Ltd. (2007) 8 SCC 466; Security Printing and Minting
Corporation of India Ltd. v. Gandhi Industrial Corportion
this writ petition are the employees of
the respondent no.2/Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Ltd.
(SPMCIL). These petitioners are admittedly posted
