Criminal) 645
titled as "R. Soundarajan V. Seed Inspector, Coimbatore and another"
observed as under:-
"26. We have carefully perused the entire
Criminal) 645
titled as "R. Soundarajan V. Seed Inspector, Coimbatore and another"
observed as under:-
"26. We have carefully perused the entire
Chander as PW3; Complainant
Jaswant Singh as PW4; Surjit Kaur as PW5; Inspector Ram Singh as PW6;
SI Jagat Singh as PW7 and Dr. Jajbir ... Criminal) 645
titled as "R. Soundarajan V. Seed Inspector, Coimbatore and another"
observed as under:-
"26. We have carefully perused the entire
Criminal) 645
titled as "R. Soundarajan V. Seed Inspector, Coimbatore and another"
observed as under:-
"26. We have carefully perused the entire
Criminal)
645 titled as "R. Soundarajan V. Seed Inspector, Coimbatore and
another" observed as under:-
"26. We have carefully perused the entire
Criminal)
645 titled as "R. Soundarajan V. Seed Inspector, Coimbatore and
another" observed as under:-
"26. We have carefully perused the entire
seeds in question. The
seeds, in question, admittedly produced by M/s Godavari Hybrid Seeds
Company had declared the germination of the seeds ... seeds was upto December 2009.
Section 16 of the Seeds Act, 1966 reads as under :-
"16. Report of Seed Analyst :- (1) The Seed
Analyst
Supreme Court of India in
the case of R.Soundarajan vs. Seed Inspector, Coimbatore and another,
2006(4) RCR (Crl.) 645, which read thus
Supreme Court in the case of "R.
Soundarajan v. Seed Inspector, Coimbatore and another" reported as
2006(4) R.C.R. (Criminal
already undergone
by him about seven months.
In R. Soundarajan v. Seed Inspector, Coimbatore and
another" reported as 2006(4) R.C.R. (Criminal