seized weapons were not stained with blood
and the weapons which were produced at the time of trial, were completely
different from the seized weapons ... learned Judge also held that the
seized weapons were not the offending weapons. As regards the charge
5
under Section 148 Indian Penal Code
seizure of the offending weapon is not
exhibited. The seized weapon does not help the prosecution in establishing
any fact discovered in relation to crime ... whether the injuries
could have been caused by the seized weapon. The weapon was not shown
to the doctor during trial to elicit his expert
seizure of the offending weapon is not
exhibited. The seized weapon does not help the prosecution in establishing
any fact discovered in relation to crime ... whether the injuries
could have been caused by the seized weapon. The weapon was not shown
to the doctor during trial to elicit his expert
Evidence Act. Mr. Mukherjee further submitted that the
seized weapons were never referred to the doctor (PW-4) to solicit
his opinion with regard ... such evidence.
31. Further, it is relevant to mention that seized weapons were
not produced before the doctor (PW-4) who treated the deceased
supplementary charge-sheet.
21. It is argued that the recovery of seized weapon is doubtful
and the FSL report is inconclusive. PW1 stated the appellant ... produce FSL
report to prove presence of human blood on the seized weapon cannot
be a ground to improbabilise the ocular version of the prosecution
appellants were present on the weapons. He did not send
the seized weapons which admittedly were blood-stained to the FSL to
determine whether ... appellants who responsible for the assault on Panchuram.
26. The weapons seized have unfortunately not been sent to the FSL
for analysis, though they were
sketch map. That apart, the article seized did not possess any
special mark on the seized weapon and no label or seal were found from ... seized. The most glaring discrepancies found in the number of
weapon seized the description of which differs in course of the evidence by the
prosecution
sketch map. That apart, the article seized did not possess any
special mark on the seized weapon and no label or seal were found from ... seized. The most glaring discrepancies found in the number of
weapon seized the description of which differs in course of the evidence by the
prosecution
seizure made and the
inquest performed. He identified the sharp cutting weapon
seized which was marked as Material Exhibit-1. He identified
the appellant ... Learned Amicus Curiae that the murder weapon was not
produced at the trial. Murder weapon was seized by the
police. Both the first Investigating Officer
injuries found on the victim could be had by the seized weapon being
material exhibit No. 1. According to him, the death ... mortem doctor opined that the injuries
could be had through the weapon seized by the Police being material exhibit.
Hence, there was no scope
