Name
Age on the date of incident
Relationship
Weapon used as per FIR
Weapon seized
Role assigned in the FIR
1.
Virendra
41 years ... Name
Age on the date of incident
Relationship
Weapon used as per FIR
Weapon seized
Role assigned in the FIR
1.
Vijaypal
68 years
Father
evidence of this witness.
3.1. Learned counsel further submitted that, the weapons seized
under the disclosure statement of Appellant does not prove that, the
injuries ... panch witnesses, he seized articles, prepared spot
panchanama, it is at 'Exhibit-21' and prepared inquest panchanama. He
seized weapons and clothes
seized the iron knife from his possession;
applicant was arrested on the spot and was brought to the police station along
with the seized weapon ... mention about the fact of putting any seal on the seized weapon in the
FIR, marked as Ex.P-6. If we go through
weapon before
us by accused Manoj Gudadhe after his statement of
admission. As we had sent for examination, to the Chemical
Analyser, the weapon seized ... following facts have
come to light about the weapon seized as per the
statement of admission of accused Manoj Gudadhe
recorded by Investigation Officer Police
specific question, he replied that he cannot say that the weapon
seized and shown to him was the same which was used for firing ... cannot say as to whether the
13
CRA No. 8/2007
seized weapon AK 47 was the same weapon that was used for firing
supplementary charge-sheet.
21. It is argued that the recovery of seized weapon is doubtful
and the FSL report is inconclusive. PW1 stated the appellant ... produce FSL
report to prove presence of human blood on the seized weapon cannot
be a ground to improbabilise the ocular version of the prosecution
weapon of offence that was seized by P.W.11 from the
spot of occurrence. Since, the seized weapon of offence was
stained with blood ... Tangia
was seized from the accused as produced by him. P.W.11
seized the blood stained earth and weapon of offence in
presence
charge leveled against the appellant. He submits that the alleged weapon seized
during the investigation was not produced and identified in the Court ... injury sustained by deceased Azim Beg could be caused by the seized
weapon. The seized weapon (knife) and clothes of the appellant & deceased
were
seizure made and the
inquest performed. He identified the sharp cutting weapon
seized which was marked as Material Exhibit-1. He identified
the appellant ... Learned Amicus Curiae that the murder weapon was not
produced at the trial. Murder weapon was seized by the
police. Both the first Investigating Officer
case in SC.No.554/2013 and also he identified the seized weapons and
the said weapons already identified ... copy of the panchanama where incident
took place and the weapons seized from the accused and produced
other materials and receiving the complaint
