afford them appointment if otherwise
they stand in merit.
The process of selection in question pertains
to the year 2013. Precisely, the case ... Eligibility
Test.
Looking to the fact that the process of
selection in question has already been completed, no
relief as prayed for by the petitioners
Single Bench dismissed the writ
petition on the count that the process of selection
in-question was initiated in the year 2008 and no
justifiable ... prescribed proforma
but that was rejected by the respondents. After
completion of process of selection appointment was
accorded to one Smt. Saroj Sihag against
order
aforesaid, the respondents are directed to proceed with the
selection process, but not declare the result of the same ... keeping it open for the respondents to go
ahead with the process of selection and further to appoint the Vice
Chancellor of the respondent University
