10th April, 1991 and accommodate the successful candidates from the selection already held in the said additional vacancies as well. The direction given ... communication of the vacancies by the State Government and complete the selection process within four months thereafter.
Thereafter first contempt petition bearing
that the present process of selection took place in the year 2010 and thereafter, one another selection process has been completed and no other candidate
10th April, 1991 and accommodate the successful candidates from the selection already held in the said additional vacancies as well. The direction given ... communication of the vacancies by the State Government and complete the selection process within four months thereafter.
Thereafter first contempt petition bearing
10th April, 1991 and accommodate the successful candidates from the selection already held in the said additional vacancies as well. The direction given ... communication of the vacancies by the State Government and complete the selection process within four months thereafter.
Thereafter first contempt petition bearing
10th April, 1991 and accommodate the successful candidates from the selection already held in the said additional vacancies as well. The direction given ... communication of the vacancies by the State Government and complete the selection process within four months thereafter.
Thereafter first contempt petition bearing
10th April, 1991 and accommodate the successful candidates from the selection already held in the said additional vacancies as well. The direction given ... communication of the vacancies by the State Government and complete the selection process within four months thereafter.
Thereafter first contempt petition bearing
stay application are accordingly dismissed, more so when selection process is complete and select list has already been issued.
(MN BHANDARI), J.
bnsharma
All corrections
though prior to it, appointments were given thus selection process had already been completed. The issue regarding two incorrect answers was never raised ... agreed terms. If issues are kept open then process of appointments cannot be completed at any point of time without limiting cut off date
criteria decided by the Administrative Committee on 30.11.2004 before commencing the selection process.
27. But what could not have been done was the second change ... minimum marks for interview, after the entire selection process (consisting of written examination and interview) was completed, would amount to changing the rules
though prior to it, appointments were given thus selection process had already been completed. The issue regarding two incorrect answers was never raised ... agreed terms. If issues are kept open then process of appointments cannot be completed at any point of time without limiting cut off date
