Jayant Verma . vs Union Of India on 16 February, 2018
afraid we cannot agree for several reasons.
Firstly, purely grammatically, a semicolon separates the
two expressions showing that they are not inextricably
connected. Also
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.31 seconds)Jansons Textile Processors vs Salem on 11 July, 2018
rule 3 (i) and sub-rule 3 (ii) are
separated by a semicolon ( ; ) followed by the disjunctive ‚or‛. The use of
semicolon ( ; ), the punctuation mark ... separated not by just a particle ‚or‛ but also by a semicolon (;), thus creating an
additional wall for conveying mutual exclusivity between
Wearit Global Ltd vs Udaipur on 2 August, 2018
rule 3 (i) and sub-rule 3
(ii) are separated by a semicolon ( ; ) followed by the disjunctive
‚or‛. The use of semicolon ( ; ), the punctuation mark ... separated not by just a
particle ‚or‛ but also by a semicolon (;), thus creating an
additional wall for conveying mutual exclusivity between
Mahesh Bharathan vs Bank Of Baroda on 23 January, 2018
construing this section too much importance should not he given to the semicolon in the first paragraph. In a case where the pawnor makes default
1