value of the teak tree fixed at `.1,00,000/-, the petitioner had
no objection, but, so far as the value over the jack fruit ... assailed by the petitioner setting forth a case that the three jack
fruit trees would fetch much more than the value fixed by the
advocate
Acquisition Act, it is necessary that a parity is brought forth
amongst the value for properties treated by the land acquisition officer
similarly ... judgment and decree under
LAA.No.1620/08 3
appeal are set aside and in substitution/modification of the same, there
will be a decree
V.Raghudharan vs Union Bank Of India And Others on 30 July, 2008
IN THE
Doraswamy vs Sivasankaran on 3 June, 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Union Of India vs Godrej - Ge Appllences Ltd on 9 April, 2008
Equivalent citations: AIR
A.B. Hussain Manikfan vs The Union Of India on 14 November, 2008
Bench: P
M/S.B'Canti Group Of Hotels & ... vs A.B.Hussian Manikfan on
Sushma Bharadwaj vs Addl.Chief Secretary To Government on 27 August, 2008
Author: Thottathil B
Karumakankavu Devaswom Kshethram ... vs Venkitachalil Damodaran Nair on 29 January, 2008
Author: K. Padmanabhan Nair
Sebastian Chokkattu vs The District Collector on 19 September, 2008
Author: K.M.Joseph
Bench
