applicable.
6. A perusal of the reframed questions, set forth above, shows that question Nos. (1) and (2) overlap and have to be dealt with ... both the payer and provider business for any applicable period set forth in annexure Ex. A to the purchase agreement to equal or exceed
trademarks and trade names under the terms and conditions set forth herein for use by Licensee in the manufacture and sale of its products.
Pursuant ... royalty at the rate of 5% of the net sales value of the agreement products manufactured and sold by the assessee. The assessee was therefore
cost of the Plot allotted should be considered as the market value of the
land at the time of allotment and hence the provisions ... land was allotted without any financial criteria that the market
value of similar plot in the locality was held to be taken as representing
Motorola Inc., Erisson Radio Systems ... vs Deputy C.I.T. on 22 June, 2005
Equivalent
Ms. Aishwarya Rai vs Dcit on 30 June, 2005
Equivalent citations: [2007]104ITD166(MUM), (2006
Samsung Electronics Company Ltd. vs Income Tax Officer on 18 February, 2005
Equivalent citations: [2005
Dy. Cit, Cir. vs Smt. R. Sunanda Bai on 18 July, 2005
Equivalent citations: [2006
Yamaha Motors (India) Pvt. Limited vs Cce on 12 April, 2005
Equivalent citations: 2005(186
Smartchem Technologies Ltd. vs Income Tax Officer on 28 July, 2005
Equivalent citations: (2005)97TTJ
Wipro Ltd. vs Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax on 21 June, 2005
Equivalent citations: (2005
