Mohan Naik of MSC
who referred to the market value of the Barge - not
insured value - in the region of Rs. 70 lacs. The complainant ... adjustment report as a document evidencing vessels
such value. This is set forth in Rule
B-24 of Rules of Practice of Association of Average
complainant is entitled to receive Rs. 31,588/-
being the sum assured value of the insurance coverage.
Hence, it is ORDERED that the Appeal
stands ... part but without any order as to cost. The impugned judgement is set aside. Consequently the petition of complaint
stands allowed in part. The Appellant
counsel is that the commissioner assessed the loss as per the market value of the spare parts. The estimated cost as per the commissioner ... appellant and prayed to set aside the order of the Forum below.
6. The argument put forth by the learned counsel for the respondent
Sahara India, Tagarapu Valas And One ... vs 01. Smt.Danthuluri Gayatri Devi,, ... on 16 October
Mahendrapal S/O.Kashiram Sharma vs 1. Manager, Idbi Bank, on 23 July, 2012
1
Mahindra & Mahindra Finanace. vs Shri.Sanjay Shivaji Padghan on 22 November, 2012
1 F
Vinayak S/O. Govindrao Joshi vs 1. Dr. Vijay Kumar Mainderkar on 22 November, 2012
The Manager, Icici Prudential Life ... vs Satinder Singh on 27 August, 2012
2nd Bench
STATE
Amont Software & Equipment Pvt. Ltd., ... vs K.Mohan S/O.Kannaih Chittoor District ... on
M/S. Venkatatraya ... vs Medikondaanasuya,W.G.Dist. on 17 August, 2012
BEFORE
A.P
