Mr. Hothur Mohammed Tauseef, Bellary vs Dcit-Circle-1, Bellary on 21 March, 2023
value was higher than the set forth value and the difference in between the
guidance value and the set forth value amount
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 514 (2.97 seconds)Trianz Holdings Private Limited , ... vs Dcit, Bangalore on 21 March, 2017
Year 2007-08
is applicable to this year also. The argument put forth by assessee's is
that Infosys Technologies Ltd is not functionally ... activity, brand value, size, etc. The TPO, however,
rejected the contention put forth by the assessee and included this
company in the set of comparables
Abb Global Industries & Services ... vs Acit, Bangalore on 24 August, 2017
this year also. We are
inclined to concur with the argument put forth by the assessee that Infosys
Technologies Ltd is not functionally comparable since ... matter, we hold that this company ought to be
omitted from the set of comparable companies. It is ordered accordingly
M/S Dell International Services India ... vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Ltu , ... on 24 June, 2020
Year 2007-08 is applicable to this
year also. The argument put forth by assessee's is that Infosys
Technologies Ltd is not functionally ... activity, brand value,
size, etc. The TPO, however, rejected the contention put forth
by the assessee and included this company in the set of
comparables
Dcit, vs M/S Misys Software Solutions (India), ... on 27 September, 2017
this year also. We are inclined to concur with the
argument put forth by the assessee that Infosys Technologies Ltd is not
functionally comparable since ... activity, brand
value, size, etc. The TPO, however, rejected the contention put forth by the
assessee and included this company in the set of comparables
Citrix R & D India Pvt. Ltd.,, Bangalore vs Ito, Bangalore on 24 March, 2017
Year 2007-08 is
applicable to this year also. The argument put forth by assessee's is that
Infosys Technologies Ltd is not functionally ... activity, brand value, size, etc. The TPO, however,
rejected the contention put forth by the assessee and included this
company in the set of comparables
Telelogic India Private Limited , ... vs Assessee on 9 March, 2016
this year also. We are inclined to concur with the argument put forth by
the assessee that Infosys Technologies Ltd is not functionally comparable since ... activity, brand value, size,
etc. The TPO, however, rejected the contention put forth by the assessee and
included this company in the set of comparables
Delmia Solutions Private Limited , ... vs Assessee on 5 September, 2013
this year
also. We are inclined to concur with the argument put forth by the assessee that Infosys
Technologies Ltd is not functionally comparable since ... activity, brand value, size,
etc. The TPO, however, rejected the contention put forth by the assessee and included
this company in the set of comparables
M/S Pmc Sierra India Pvt. Ltd.,, vs Department Of Income Tax on 26 August, 2016
M/S Pmc Sierra India Pvt. Ltd.,, vs Department Of Income Tax on 26 August
Serial Innovations India Private ... vs Assessee on 30 June, 2015
Year 2007-08 is applicable to this year also.
The argument put forth by assessee's is that Infosys
Technologies Ltd is not functionally ... activity, brand value, size, etc. The TPO, however,
rejected the contention put forth by the assessee and
included this company in the set of comparables