Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 45 (0.72 seconds)

M.Kavya vs The Chairman

gender sensitisation; (4) formulating guidelines for dealing with sexual harassments; (5) preparation of a booklet on sexual harassment and gender sensitisation; (6) preparation of courses ... following acts may also amount to sexual harassment: presence or occurrence of circumstances of implied or explicit promise of preferential treatment in employment; threat

M.Kavya vs The Chairman

gender sensitisation; (4) formulating guidelines for dealing with sexual harassments; (5) preparation of a booklet on sexual harassment and gender sensitisation; (6) preparation of courses ... following acts may also amount to sexual harassment: presence or occurrence of circumstances of implied or explicit promise of preferential treatment in employment; threat

Mary Rajasekaran vs University Of Madras

sexual favours; or (iii) making sexually coloured remarks; or (iv) showing pornography; or (v) any other unwelcome physical, verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual ... connected with any act or behavior of sexual harassment may amount to sexual harassment:— (i) implied or explicit promise of preferential treatment in her employment
Madras High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - N S Kumar - Full Document

Unknown vs By Adv.Sri.J.Om Prakash

preferred within a period of ninety days of the recommendations." As explicit from Section 18, where the service rules applicable to the person concerned ... only in the manner prescribed under the Act. Rule 11 of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Rules
Kerala High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - P B Kumar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next