have been granted joint custody of the
minor children with the shared parenting as provided therein.
2. Briefly stated, the parties got married ... children were
comfortable in company of both the parties, a shared-parenting
arrangement was laid down as under: -
"62. Accordingly, the shared parent
have been granted joint custody of the
minor children with the shared parenting as provided therein.
2. Briefly stated, the parties got married ... children were
comfortable in company of both the parties, a shared-parenting
arrangement was laid down as under: -
"62. Accordingly, the shared parent
have been granted joint custody of the
minor children with the shared parenting as provided therein.
2. Briefly stated, the parties got married ... children were
comfortable in company of both the parties, a shared-parenting
arrangement was laid down as under: -
"62. Accordingly, the shared parent
have been granted joint custody of the
minor children with the shared parenting as provided therein.
2. Briefly stated, the parties got married ... children were
comfortable in company of both the parties, a shared-parenting
arrangement was laid down as under: -
"62. Accordingly, the shared parent
have been granted joint custody of the
minor children with the shared parenting as provided therein.
2. Briefly stated, the parties got married ... children were
comfortable in company of both the parties, a shared-parenting
arrangement was laid down as under: -
"62. Accordingly, the shared parent
luxury and insisted that he should
separate from his parents, take his share from the property of his parents
and live with the respondent/wife ... separate accommodation is arranged and the
appellant/husband takes a share in the parental property.
23. The appellant/husband had also asserted that the respondent
their parents who all became entitled to 1/5th share each. Both the
parents have bequeathed their 1/5th share in the Ajanta Complex through ... Wills by her parents. The plaintiff has reiterated her right to a share in
the properties of Late Smt. Kaushalya Srivastava .
22. The plaintiff
Delhi and also told him to claim his share in the properties of
his parents. As a result of the inducement, the appellant resigned from ... when he asked for his share in the ancestral property, his parents
denied the same, as they were annoyed because the marriage was against
their
only in respect of the partnership
properties and the shares which their parents held in the partnership
properties and that suit did not concern with ... plaintiff inherited 1/5th share out of the 1/4th
share in the suit property i.e. 1/20th share in the suit property. After
Brig Dinesh Khatri & Anr vs The State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr
