direct co-parenting. It is the custodial parent, who
would have to instill the importance of the non-custodial parent. She would
submit that ... parents, he threatens the custodial parent with the claim for
guardianship and custody to force the custodial parent to give up rights. If a
shared
third respondent initiated proceedings in the Court at Perth for shared parental responsibility. Based on the compromise arrived at between the petitioner and the third ... Magistrate Court at Perth, Australia passed final orders on 7.7.2011 granting shared parenting responsibility of the detenu P. Arjun and granted permanent custody
schedule properties have been allotted to the shares of parents,
whereas, 'C to E' schedule properties have been allotted to the shares ... respect of the properties
which have been allotted to the share of parents and also some properties which
have not been included in the partition
their duty, under normal circumstances, to draw up a parenting schedule and share the responsibility of co-parenting to bring up the child ... ideal situation, the parents themselves should come forward to draw up "parenting schedules" so that both the parents share the responsibilities for bringing
marriages are entitled to only their parents' property, whether self-acquired or ancestral, falling to parents' share after partition. However, the matter ... voidable marriage are legitimate and they are entitled to share in their parent's property, as per Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage
only shareholders of a particular company holding not less than 1/10th shares of the company is entitled to invoke the provisions of sections ... deal with the situation where the petitioner was holding shares in the parent company and not in the subsidiary company, and the Calcutta High Court
submitted that only shareho
particular company holding not less than 1/10th shares of the company is
entitled to invoke the provisions of sections ... deal with the situation where the petitioner was holding shares in the parent company an
subsidiary company, and the Calcutta High Court has adverted
crores as on 31.03.2002. Share premium should be given sanctity like shares. According to Section 78 of the Act, share holders are entitled ... asset belonging to the share holders would certainly amount to detriment and prejudice to the share holders and creditors. The parent company would be certainly
entitled to equal share i.e., 1/3rd share in the immovable as well as the movables left by her parents.
26. The deceased plaintiff ... Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the shares in the immovables left by her parents late Mrs.Ramalakshmi Krishnasamy and Dr.K.G Krishnasamy
Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and that, if the share income of the parent partner is omitted to be included in the assessment, that ... minor partner's share income also along with the parent-partner's share income and making the correction accordingly in the individual assessment
