Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations,
Cuyahoga County, Ohio. The shared parenting means the
parents share the rights and responsibilities as provided for in a
plan ... Shared Parenting Plan, whereby he
pledged “not to withhold time with the other
Parent as a punishment to the children or the
other Parent
until Saturday
September 29, 2018 @ noon. Thereafter, the parties are
to share parenting time as follows :
mother to have child every other week from Saturday ... parent) parents shall allow whatsapp
calling with child with custodial parent at least 5 min.
per evening upon reasonable notice to other parent.
Parents shall
counsel, the most
appropriate course would be to follow the joint shared parenting
plan, in which the child would interact with both the parents ... Guidelines alongwith Parenting Plan16. According to
the appellant, joint custody or shared parenting would be in the
“best interest and welfare of the child”. That
contractual right. It vested in HTIL
as HTIL was a parent company, i.e., a 100% shareholder of
the subsidiary; (ii) According to the Revenue ... which would have jeopardized VIH's
control over 15% of the shares of HEL and, consequently,
the stake of HTIL in TII would have
share in the coparcenary property or
whether their share is limited only to the self-
acquired property of their parents under Section ... family
property such children will be entitled only to a
share in their parents' property but they cannot
claim it on their own right
Bombay. if she so desires.
57
The present arrangement of the parents sharing the
company of the children during the vacation to continue
parents was necessary. A suggestion was
made to work out a shared parenting schedule. However,
Smriti declined to hold any talks to work ... shared
parenting schedule.
On the undisputed facts, the Family Court was of the view
that given the future prospects of the child, the same would
market value
of those shares as on the date he 'became entitled to those
shares. The value of the shares distributed does not depend ... sold those
shares. Therefore it made no profits in respect of those
shares. So long as it retained those shares in its ,own
hands
held that
the paramount interest of the children would lie in shared
parenting by the parties in the U.S., and that the Petitioner
– wife
void or voidable
marriage will only be entitled to a share in their parents’ property but not
in their own right:
“38…Logically ... partition of an ancestral
property, the property falling in the share of the
parents of such children is regarded as their self-
acquired and absolute
