land had given the same to husband of defendant No.1 on Shikmi
hence the defendants have become the Bhumiswami thereof by virtue
of provisions ... MPHC-IND:12927
6
to the defendants or their predecessors on Shikmi. The defendants are
encroachers over the suit land. The Dhar Estate Commission
land had given the same to husband of defendant No.1 on Shikmi
hence the defendants have become the Bhumiswami thereof by virtue
of provisions ... MPHC-IND:12927
6
to the defendants or their predecessors on Shikmi. The defendants are
encroachers over the suit land. The Dhar Estate Commission
Tarawati And Anr. vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue ... on 10 November
under:
"7. As regards the plea of sub-tenancy (shikmi) argued on behalf of
the defendants by their learned counsel, first we may note ... into. Therefore, in the absence of a clear
plea regarding sub-tenancy (shikmi), the defendants cannot be
allowed to build up a case
reproduced below:-
"20. Conferral of Pacca tenancy right on Tenants and Shikmis.--(1) Subject to other
provisions of this Act, every tenant ... Jagirdar, or zamindar including the "Shikmi"
shall, as from the date of resumption be deemed to be a Pacca tenant of the land
reproduced below:-
"20. Conferral of Pacca tenancy right on Tenants and Shikmis.--(1) Subject to other
provisions of this Act, every tenant ... Jagirdar, or zamindar including the "Shikmi"
shall, as from the date of resumption be deemed to be a Pacca tenant of the land
been held as under :-
7. As regards the plea of sub tenancy (shikmi)
argued on behalf of the defendants by their learned counsel,
first ... into. Therefore, in the
absence of a clear plea regarding sub tenancy (shikmi) the
defendants cannot be allowed to build up a case
property in dispute was never alienated
to defendant No. 1 nor any Shikmi agreement was ever executed. It was
further pleaded that defendant ... defendant No. 1 that from 1949 he was in
possession as Shikmi Kashtkar on behalf of defendant No. 2 and was
regularly making payment
their predecessors over the suit
lands has been by way of Shikmi. In the revenue records, there is no
mention of the suit lands belonging ... years at least.
Their possession has been on the basis of being Shikmi over the suit
lands. There is no document on record to demonstrate
Smt. Kamlikar Anasuja vs Sri K. Sajjanlal on 3 January, 2025
Author: G.Radha Rani
