whether he be personally in possession of the holding or through his Shikmidar] [Substituted for clause (11) by the A.P Adaptation of Laws Order ... Shikmidar" means the person who like a "Pattadar" possesses a title to the land or who from the beginning has been jointly in possession
whether he be personally in possession of the holding or through his Shikmidar; (12) "Shikmidar" means the person who like Pattadar possesses a title ... acquire by virtue of that law the right of a Shikmidar. (13) "asami shikmi" means a lessee, whether holding under an instrument or under
disallowed- the petitioner from adducing evidence to substantiate his claim as 'shikmidar' in the land under reference.
2. The facts may be shortly ... award Lila Mahton was described as 'shikmidar'.
On 15-12-1954 Lila Mahton filed another petition before the Collector repeating his claim that
party falsely claimed to be in possession of the disputed land as Shikmidars from 1332 Fasli. The proceeding under Section 107 was dropped ... party is that the disputed land has been in their possession as Shikmidars from Baisakh 1332 Fasli on settlement by defendant 5. Hence the plaintiffs
written statement died by the defendants it was admitted that they were Shikmidars.
3. The Court below held that the plaintiffs are the owners ... that as the defendants, the shikmidars, defaulted to pay rent, they were liable to be evicted. A decree for arrears was also passed
against Ramachandra Naik and his brother, for a declaration that he is Shikmidar of the suit lands and is therefore entitled to permanent rights ... payment of rent even if he were to be a Shikmidar. We will now proceed to examine if and how far these contentions are well
properties.
3. It is the case of the plaintiffs that they are
Shikmidar and they are rendering service to Jama Masjid
accordingly. They have admitted ... that defendants are
also Shikmidars, survitors as they are also descendants
of the predecessor of plaintiffs to whom the grant was
given
respondent no. 5 to
7 and Sk. Makiruddin was recorded as shikmidar of the aforesaid land
vide shikmi khata no. 334. However, a land ceiling ... executing registered sale deed dated 07.01.1960 and
similarly, the recorded Shikmidar, namely, Sk. Makiruddin, who
happened to be father of respondent no. 8, had also
defendants 1 and 2. The plaintiffs asserted that the shikmidars had no right to transfer the land to defendants 1 and 2, that there ... decree for ejectment and (3) that defendants 3 to 10 being shikmidars had no right to transfer the disputed land to defendants
village records showing the name of Wamanrao Kulkarni as the 'Shikmidar' to the extent of 1/2 share in the suit land ... defendant cannot effect the rights of the plaintiff as 'Shikmidar' to the extent of 1/2 share in the suit land. He also
