Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 257 (0.85 seconds)

Sunshine Exports Pvt. Ltd. vs Cce on 16 March, 2004

hence there was no process of shrink proofing in terms of definition of "Shrink proofing" appearing in the notification ... absence of any proof of marketability of the item as a shrink-proof, the charges that appellant had manufactured shrink-proof fabric is not sustainable
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Tamil Nadu Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Cce vs Ashima Denims on 27 November, 2002

become shrink proofed. The respondents have pointed out that the shrink proofing that takes place in their factory is the incidental shrinkage of fabrics, when ... parlance, such incidental shrink proofing is not treated as process of shrink proofing. They have pointed out that shrink proofed fabrics, according to the clarification
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 3 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

K G Denim Ltd vs Salem on 15 April, 2024

shrink proof'. It was explained that their product could not be considered ‗shrink proof' for the reason that residual shrinkage in the fabric ... than 1.5%. To support this, they referred to the definition of ‗shrink proofed fabric' as per Board's letter
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K G Denim Limited vs Salem on 15 April, 2024

shrink proof'. It was explained that their product could not be considered ‗shrink proof' for the reason that residual shrinkage in the fabric ... than 1.5%. To support this, they referred to the definition of ‗shrink proofed fabric' as per Board's letter
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K G Denim Ltd vs Salem on 15 April, 2024

shrink proof'. It was explained that their product could not be considered ‗shrink proof' for the reason that residual shrinkage in the fabric ... than 1.5%. To support this, they referred to the definition of ‗shrink proofed fabric' as per Board's letter
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K G Denim Limited vs Salem on 15 April, 2024

shrink proof'. It was explained that their product could not be considered ‗shrink proof' for the reason that residual shrinkage in the fabric ... than 1.5%. To support this, they referred to the definition of ‗shrink proofed fabric' as per Board's letter
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next