this writ petition claims himself to be a
victim of Anti-Sikh riots of 1984 and in recognition of he being such a
victim ... petitioner is that
notwithstanding, his undisputed status as an Anti-Sikh riot victim, the
benefits flowing from several Government policies, especially dated
03.11.2008 (Annexure
Oral)
The petitioners are statedly victims of '1984 Anti-Sikh Riots'.
Their victimization has been accepted by the Competent Authority by
issuing them
that her status as a
victim of '1984 Anti-Sikh Riots' is not being determined by the
Deputy Commissioner, SAS Nagar Mohali, keeping ... found to be a genuine '1984 Anti-Sikh Riots' victim,
recommend her claim for the benefits under the Government Policy
to the Competent
petitioners are stated to be victims of '1984 Anti-Sikh
Riots' to whom, pursuant to the order dated 14.9.2010 passed in Civil Writ
Oral)
The petitioners are statedly victims of '1984 Anti-Sikh Riots'.
Their victimization has been accepted by the Competent Authority by
issuing them
contention of the petitioners that they are 1984 Sikh
riot victims and in support of this, they have placed on record the red
identity cards
petitioners is that their status as
victims of '1984 Anti-Sikh Riots' is not being determined by the
Deputy Commissioner, Ludhiana, keeping ... they
are found to be genuine '1984 Anti-Sikh Riots' victims, recommend
their claim for the benefits under the Government Policy
that his status as a
victim of '1984 Anti-Sikh Riots' is not being determined by the
Deputy Commissioner, Ludhiana, keeping in view ... found to be a genuine '1984 Anti-Sikh Riots' victim, recommend his
claim for the benefits under the Government Policy to the
Competent
Oral)
The petitioners are statedly victims of '1984 Anti-Sikh Riots'.
Their victimization has been accepted by the Competent Authority by
issuing them
petitioners claim themselves to be victims of '1984
Anti-Sikh Riots'. Their grievance is that the Deputy Commissioner,
Ludhiana, as well
