Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Daya @ Dayananda vs State Of Karnataka on 16 January, 2021 Bench: B.Veerappa , M.Nagaprasanna

witness has stated that Society has formed fifty sites, the trial Court arrived at a conclusion that there cannot be any additional site, much less ... Society's suit with site No.51/A. Simultaneously, the trial Court also observed that since Smt.Meera Chengappa, the plaintiff

which the departmental proceedings may or may not be stayed pending trial in criminal case against the delinquent officer. Each case requires to be considered ... circumstances. There would be no bar to proceed simultaneously with departmental enquiry and trial of a criminal case unless the charge in the criminal trial

should commence and after completing the trial, same judicial officer is required to dispose of both cases simultaneously by two separate judgments. The learned counsel ... held that, in case and counter case where trial is conducted by the same Court, the trial Judge may choose to acquit the accused

accused and as a result suddenly the incident has occurred. Hence, the Trial Court has rightly came to a conclusion that incident took place ... this Court. 20. Further, the Trial Court has also observed that accused Nos.1 and 3 simultaneously attacked the deceased-Pashamiya. The evidence

prosecution should be conducted by two different Public Prosecutors. The trial should be conducted by the same court. After recording the evidence and after hearing ... pronounced by the same Judge simultaneously i.e., one after the other. In deciding each case, the Trial Judge can only rely on the evidence

Crime No.81/2017. It is for the trial Court to try both these cases simultaneously and to find ... good defence that may be available to the accused before the Trial Court. Therefore, I am of the opinion that no grounds are made

respondent- husband filed petition under Section 13 (1) of the Act. The trial court placed the appellant-wife exparte and proceeded to pass the judgment ... notice through the Court or simultaneously through Court as well as by RPAD. The procedure followed by the trial court to place the appellant - wife

Court for conducting the trial but the trial Court was not able to proceed with the conducting of the trial due to non-appointment ... witness, the trial is still pending. It goes to show that the opinion of the trial Court holding that trial would be delayed is correct

such provisions will melt down where there is no likelihood of trial being completed within a reasonable time and the period of incarceration already undergone ... denial of bail or for wholesale breach of constitutional right to speedy trial. 18. Adverting to the case at hand, we are conscious