confession
was recorded at 13.30 hours and the alleged recovery of the skeleton of the
-2-
deceased was undertaken at 15.15 hours on 24th November ... statement of the
Investigating Officer (P.W.7) during trial, the skeleton was kept in Malkhana.
Such material seizure was not produced in court either
taken place on 27th December, 2016 and, on 15th February, 2017,
a skeleton of human body is said to have been recovered from
the place ... which is said to have been indicated by the appellant.
The aforesaid skeleton was sent for medical test and it was
found that
2018, Pappu S/o Gokul Yadav
informed the police that one human skeleton was lying in the forest of
Madantala, Shahgarh. On that Police registered ... under
section 174 of the Cr.P.C. and seized that human skeleton, one knife, jeans
and other material from the spot. During investigation
2018, Pappu S/o Gokul Yadav
informed the police that one human skeleton was lying in the forest of
Madantala, Shahgarh. O n that, Police ... under
section 174 of the Cr.P.C. and seized that human skeleton, one knife, jeans
and other material from the spot. During investigation
lodged by PW-3 on 13 th August,
1997, a skeleton was recovered from the banks of river
Barakar, at a distance of about
that at the
2 MCRC-38784-2020
instance of the present applicant, skeleton of the deceased was found,
therefore, it can be easily gathered that
including present applicant dead body was buried near Chakiyadah
Ghat. Though the skeleton has been recovered, but the identification
could be done on the basis
last seen together and the recovery of the dead
body or the skeleton, as the case may be, may not
be of much consequence
last
seen together and the recovery of the dead
body or the skeleton, as the case may be, may
not be of much consequence
last
seen together and the recovery of the dead
body or the skeleton, as the case may be, may
not be of much consequence
