Shri Subodh Asthana vs M/S Skypak Service Specialist Ltd & Anr on 15 February, 2011
Author: Indermeet Kaur
Bench: Indermeet Kaur
* IN THE HIGH ... SUBODH ASTHANA ...........Appellant
Through: Mr. K.K. Sabharwal, Advocate.
Versus
M/S SKYPAK SERVICE SPECIALIST LTD & ANR. .......Respondents
Through: Nemo.
CORAM
Suit. No. 162/09 vs Skypak Services Specialist Ltd on 15 February, 2011
In the Court of Sh. Praveen Singh: Additional Senior Civil Judge ... Advocate,
Chamber no. 222, Patiala House Courts,
New Delhi-01. ....................... Plaintiff.
VERSUS
Skypak Services Specialist ltd.
Through its M.D.
Ms. Devika Kulkarni
Regd. Office
Number mailer
was sent to said Anil Kumar subsequently on 18.09.2003 through Skypak
Courier vide AWB No.903644271.
First Appeal No.1556 ... Unit Post
Orderly of 155 Medium Regiment. M/s Skypak Courier also assured the
delivery of parcel, but they showed their inability to produce
service" for the purposes of the CP Act ."
30) In Skypak Couriers Ltd. v. Tata Chemicals Ltd. , (2000) 5 SCC
294, this Court
Employees State Insurance Corporation and AIR 2000 SC 2008 Skypak Couriers Ltd. Tata Chemicals Ltd.
20. Even the discretionary administrative power entrusted by the statute
Supreme Court in the decision reported in AIR 2000 Supreme Court 2008 (Skypak
Couriers Ltd.-Vs-Tata Chemicals Ltd.) dealing with the question
Supreme Court in the decision reported in AIR 2000 Supreme Court 2008 (Skypak
Couriers Ltd.-Vs-Tata Chemicals Ltd.) dealing with the question
Alitalia Cargo & Ors. 2010 (2) (RCR) (Civil) and
Skypak Couriers Ltd. Vs.
Tata Chemicals Ltd. (2000) 5 SCC 294.
11. As per petitioners case
Supreme Court was pleased to hold in the judgment
reported as "SKYPAK COURIERS LTD. ETC., ETC. v. TATA CHEMICALS ... that this case stands covered by a
decision of this Court in Skypak Couriers Ltd. v. Tata
Chemicals
Supreme Court in the decision reported in AIR 2000 Supreme Court 2008
(Skypak Couriers Limitedvs-Tata Chemicals Limited) dealing with the question
