Skypak Couriers Ltd., vs M/S.Wartsila Diesel India Ltd., on 21 September, 2010
BEFORE THE HON
BEFORE THE HONBLE
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ... 2010
District Consumer Disputes
Redressal Forum, Mumbai Suburban District.
M/s.Skypak Couriers
Ltd.,
(now known as M/s.Skypak
Services Specialists Ltd.,)
Skypak House
Shri K. Rajbhar S/O Mahadev Rajbhar vs M/S Skypak Services Specialists Ltd on 5 August, 2010
IN THE COURT OFSH. SUKHDEV SINGH ... Mahadev Rajbhar
Through UPLP
8/440, Trilokpuri,
Delhi.
Versus
M/s Skypak Services Specialists Ltd.
L-357, Mahpalpur Extension
New Delhi
M/s ESSEE Couriers
Shri Suresh Kumar vs M/S Skypak Services Specialists Ltd on 5 August, 2010
IN THE COURT OFSH. SUKHDEV SINGH,ADJ/POLC-VII
(EAST-DISTRICT ... Rajeshwar Tiwari
Through UPLF, 8/440, Triok Puri
Delhi.
Versus
M/s Skypak Services Specialists Ltd.
LB-35 Tolstoy House,
17 Tolstoy Marg,
New Delhi
Hence, the claim.
5 In the Written Statement, the Management /
M/s Skypak Services Ltd has taken various pleas and stated
that M/s Skypak ... different
organisations. They have further stated that the
Management of M/s Skypak Services Specialists Ltd.,
neither interviewed the Workman nor appointed him. Other
pleas
persons and concerns
i.e. BPL Ltd., Sansui, Whirlpool, HCL Stores and Skypak
and that the defendant without the previous consent of
the plaintiffs transferred
Note Nos. 1541795 & 1541796 both
dated 25.01.1991 issued by M/s. Skypak Couriers Ltd. to
the plaintiff;
7. Copy of letter dated 28.01.1991 sent
Thiruvalluvar Trasport Corporation Vs. Consumer Protection Council ,
(2) AIR 2000 SC 2008 Skypak Couriers Ltd. Vs. Viswabarathi House Building
Co-operative Society
circulated to the Departmental Yes
authorities?
Appellant/s M/s. Skypak Services Specialists Ltd.
Represented by None
Vs.
Respondent/s CCE Vadodara
Represented by Shri
other option discretion
but to make a reference. The case of
Skypak Couriers Ltd.-Vs-Tata Chemicals Ltd. reported
National Commission in the matter of Tata Chemicals Ltd. Vs.
Skypak Couriers Pvt. Ltd. ; 2002 (2) CPC 107, more so, when
