exchange allegedly issued. The
petitioner/respondent No.4 was merely a sleeping partner of the
firm having no concern with affairs of the firm ... offence by the
petitioner/accused No.4, who is merely a sleeping partner of the
Firm.
6 The learned Advocate further relied on the Judgment
exchange allegedly issued. The
petitioner/respondent No.4 was merely a sleeping partner of the
firm having no concern with affairs of the firm ... offence by the
petitioner/accused No.4, who is merely a sleeping partner of the
Firm.
6 The learned Advocate further relied on the Judgment
exchange allegedly issued. The
petitioner/respondent No.4 was merely a sleeping partner of the
firm having no concern with affairs of the firm ... offence by the
petitioner/accused No.4, who is merely a sleeping partner of the
Firm.
6 The learned Advocate further relied on the Judgment
exchange allegedly issued. The
petitioner/respondent No.4 was merely a sleeping partner of the
firm having no concern with affairs of the firm ... offence by the
petitioner/accused No.4, who is merely a sleeping partner of the
Firm.
6 The learned Advocate further relied on the Judgment
exchange allegedly issued. The
petitioner/respondent No.4 was merely a sleeping partner of the
firm having no concern with affairs of the firm ... offence by the
petitioner/accused No.4, who is merely a sleeping partner of the
Firm.
6 The learned Advocate further relied on the Judgment
exchange allegedly issued. The
petitioner/respondent No.4 was merely a sleeping partner of the
firm having no concern with affairs of the firm ... offence by the
petitioner/accused No.4, who is merely a sleeping partner of the
Firm.
6 The learned Advocate further relied on the Judgment
exchange allegedly issued. The
petitioner/respondent No.4 was merely a sleeping partner of the
firm having no concern with affairs of the firm ... offence by the
petitioner/accused No.4, who is merely a sleeping partner of the
Firm.
6 The learned Advocate further relied on the Judgment
exchange allegedly issued. The
petitioner/respondent No.4 was merely a sleeping partner of the
firm having no concern with affairs of the firm ... offence by the
petitioner/accused No.4, who is merely a sleeping partner of the
Firm.
6 The learned Advocate further relied on the Judgment
