2013 18:33:56 :::
901.arbpl606.12.sxw
slow progress of work. In turn, the Respondent forwarded the said
show cause notice ... dispute arose between
the Petitioner and Respondent about the alleged slow progress of
work. The Petitioner sent a reply on 1st March
completion of
work was 12 months i.e. 16.11.2007. The work order reflects
condition that the contractor shall not proceed with the work till ... engaged on site. The applicant had sent various letters intimating
very slow work progress and directed to speed up the work. There
was shortage
there is no desired progress at various work fronts. The slow
progress of work is apparent from the figures indicated in notice dated 24
March
completion of
work was 12 months i.e. 16.11.2007. The work order reflects
condition that the contractor shall not proceed with the work till ... engaged on site. The applicant had sent various letters intimating
very slow work progress and directed to speed up the work. There
was shortage
several occasions pointing
606-26-WP.odt
{11}
out the slow progress of work and the non-deployment of requisite
manpower at the site. Regular ... fully aware of the
concerns of the respondents regarding the slow progress of the work
and the non-deployment of adequate manpower and machinery
considerable
period. The Defendants had informed the Plaintiff about slow
progress of work through various communications. The Plaintiff did
not reply any of the communications ... Department had time to time informed the Plaitniff regarding slow
progress of work. The Department had also imposed penalty for
slow progress of work. Even
Notice on
19 March 2019 under the GCC for slow progress of
the subject work achieved by the Petitioner. Petitioner
was issued second Show Cause ... Notice on 30 January
2020 for slow progress of the subject work. On both
occasions, Petitioner furnished its reply and remained
present for hearing before
raised in this Public Interest Litigation
is in regard to slow progress of the work on the National
Highway No. 66, namely, the Mumbai ... work
for this section. According to him, the contractors have not
been diligent in undertaking the work, not only on the slow
progress
Corporation was
entitled to levy fine on the Contractor for slow progress of work as
compared to bar chart approved
Corporation was
entitled to levy fine on the Contractor for slow progress of work as
compared to bar chart approved
