Balagi D vs E.S.I.C on 24 January, 2020
1 OA No. 170
Respondent No.
1.
25. The Respondent No. 1 also denied alleged slow progress work levelled by
the Corporate Debtor. The Respondent No. 1 further referred ... Corporate Debtor is stated to have raised the issues regarding slow progress of
work, non-mobilisation of adequate manpower etc. In fact, the Corporate
Debtor
Respondent No.
1.
25. The Respondent No. 1 also denied alleged slow progress work levelled by
the Corporate Debtor. The Respondent No. 1 further referred ... Corporate Debtor is stated to have raised the issues regarding slow progress of
work, non-mobilisation of adequate manpower etc. In fact, the Corporate
Debtor
Respondent No.
1.
25. The Respondent No. 1 also denied alleged slow progress work levelled by
the Corporate Debtor. The Respondent No. 1 further referred ... Corporate Debtor is stated to have raised the issues regarding slow progress of
work, non-mobilisation of adequate manpower etc. In fact, the Corporate
Debtor
Respondent No.
1.
25. The Respondent No. 1 also denied alleged slow progress work levelled by
the Corporate Debtor. The Respondent No. 1 further referred ... Corporate Debtor is stated to have raised the issues regarding slow progress of
work, non-mobilisation of adequate manpower etc. In fact, the Corporate
Debtor
Respondent No.
1.
25. The Respondent No. 1 also denied alleged slow progress work levelled by
the Corporate Debtor. The Respondent No. 1 further referred ... Corporate Debtor is stated to have raised the issues regarding slow progress of
work, non-mobilisation of adequate manpower etc. In fact, the Corporate
Debtor
Respondent No.
1.
25. The Respondent No. 1 also denied alleged slow progress work levelled by
the Corporate Debtor. The Respondent No. 1 further referred ... Corporate Debtor is stated to have raised the issues regarding slow progress of
work, non-mobilisation of adequate manpower etc. In fact, the Corporate
Debtor
Respondent No.
1.
25. The Respondent No. 1 also denied alleged slow progress work levelled by
the Corporate Debtor. The Respondent No. 1 further referred ... Corporate Debtor is stated to have raised the issues regarding slow progress of
work, non-mobilisation of adequate manpower etc. In fact, the Corporate
Debtor
Elect. Divn. No. 5 to the electrical contractor regarding slow progress of work/delay in laying of electrical conduit pipes in staircases ... Elect. Div. No.5, to the electrical contractor regarding slow progress of work/delay in laying of electrical conduit pipes in staircases
limited to, non-
deployment of requisite machinery, delayed commencement of work, slow
progress, incorrect or missing barricades, cracks or damage observed during
quality inspections