Iffco Tokio vs S.Ilangovan on 7 September, 2018
introduced in the Act by way of social security scheme. It is a Code by itself. It appears from the objects and reasons
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 1177 (1.95 seconds)Smt. Janki Devi vs Rohtash Kumar on 1 December, 2018
report Ex.R3W3/X, notice under Order 12 Rule 8
CPC dated 26.12.2017 Ex.R3W3/Y issued to the ESIC and the
employer ... R3W5 Pawan Kumar, Social Security Officer, ESIC,
Noida admitted receipt of notice under Order 12 Rule 8 CPC
dated
Jaipal Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh 40 Wpc/2483/2018 ... on 19 November, 2018
withdrawal form for Rs. 3,900/-
singed by the Sarpanch towards social security pension to be
given to the beneficiaries, 26 in number, but thereafter ... fact, the amount to be withdrawn for being given as Social
Security Pension to the beneficiaries was Rs. 3,900/- but the
applicant herein made
Tata Communications Ltd vs Employees State Insurance Corpn on 11 July, 2018
affidavit of one Amita Kapadia, Social
Security Officer, in which it was contended that the respondent had allotted a
code to the company to cover
The Divisional Manager, vs Smt. Kamalamma W/O Redeppa on 30 November, 2018
social security
14
scheme. It is needless to say that the said
provision is a code by itself. The said
provision has been inserted
Parshuram Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 1 February, 2018
Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of defalcation of
Rs.4.75 lacs granted for Social Security Pension Scheme.
Submission of learned counsel
Saroj Khurana & Ors. vs . Mahinder Kr. Khurana & Ors. on 15 October, 2018
social security scheme. It is needless to say that
the said provision is a code by itself. The said provision has
been inserted to provide
Avtar Singh & Anr. vs . Rajinder Singh & Anr. on 22 December, 2018
social security scheme. It is needless to say that the said
provision is a code by itself. The said provision has been inserted
to provide
Navtej Singh Johar vs Union Of India Ministry Of Law And ... on 6 September, 2018
fear of state action and social stigma. Further, a conviction under
Section 377 IPC renders such persons ineligible for appointment as a
director ... company.
31. It is averred that Section 377 IPC, by creating a taint of
criminality, deprives the LGBT persons of their right to reputation
which
Shakti Vahini vs Union Of India on 27 March, 2018
Shakti Vahini vs Union Of India on 27 March, 2018
Equivalent citations: AIR 2018 SUPREME