Ms Saraswathi G J vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 July, 2022
Author: M
Maniben Maganbhai Bhariya vs District Development Officer on 25 April, 2022
Author: Ajay Rastogi
Bench
which is also reflected
in Section 151(3) of the Code on Social Security, 2020.
21. We have heard other learned counsel appearing
adduced in support of the
objections. It is stated that the Social Security Officer carried out the survey
of the factory on 06.12.2010 and found ... recommended for allotment of
Code. The Social Security Officer, who in turn, has explained that the
factory is functioning throughout the year (beyond seven months
inserted by way
of a social security scheme and is a Code by itself. It was
elucidated therein that it appears from the Objects
observed that it is
in the nature of a social security measure. It is a Code by itself.
After adverting to the previous pronouncements dealing
introduced in the Act
by way of a social security scheme. It is a code by
itself. It appears from the Objects and Reasons
introduced in the Act
by way of a social security scheme. It is a code by
itself. It appears from the Objects and Reasons
introduced in the Act
by way of a social security scheme. It is a code by
itself. It appears from the Objects and Reasons
Factory can be construed as a seasonal factory or not? The Social Security
Officer, after inspection, submitted a report, recommending that the
Appellant Factory ... Appellant Factory and the Officer also recommended for
allotment of Code Number. The Social Security Officer has specifically
stated that the Appellant Factory is engaged