Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 636 (0.84 seconds)

The Conservator Of Forest vs Rajesha on 28 July, 2023

this that in the aforesaid Australian case the distinction between sovereign and non-sovereign functions was categorised as regal and non-regal. In some cases ... State function, whereas in some Governmental function. 13. The aforesaid shows that if we were to extend the concept of sovereign function to include
Karnataka High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Conservator Of Forest vs Shivanna on 28 July, 2023

this that in the aforesaid Australian case the distinction between sovereign and non-sovereign functions was categorised as regal and non-regal. In some cases ... State function, whereas in some Governmental function. 13. The aforesaid shows that if we were to extend the concept of sovereign function to include
Karnataka High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Conservator Of Forest vs Mahesha on 28 July, 2023

this that in the aforesaid Australian case the distinction between sovereign and non-sovereign functions was categorised as regal and non-regal. In some cases ... State function, whereas in some Governmental function. 13. The aforesaid shows that if we were to extend the concept of sovereign function to include
Karnataka High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next