Spanco Ltd. vs State Bank Of Mysore on 10 July, 2017
Author: D.Y. Chandrachud
Bench: D.Y. Chandrachud
CHAMBER MATTER COURT NO.4 SECTION ... Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s).
18127/2015
M/S. SPANCO LTD. & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE BANK OF MYSORE Respondent
Vishwanath Chandrakaprasad Gupta vs M/S Spanco Ltd on 16 March, 2017
Cause Title/Judgement-Entry STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCH ... Centril Avanue road Nagpur Nagpur MS ...........Appellant(s) Versus 1. M/s Spanco Ltd 5 th floor Narang Tower Civil lines Nagpur Nagpur ...........Respondent
Mohan Vitthalrao Joshi vs Spanco Nagpur Discom Limited on 11 December, 2017
Cause Title/Judgement-Entry STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCH ... RIDGE ROAD, NAGPUR NAGPUR MAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s) Versus 1. SPANCO NAGPUR DISCOM LIMITED 5TH FLOOR NARANG TOWERS, PALM ROAD, SND LIMITED, NAGPUR NAGPUR MAHARASHTRA
Shri.Govind S/O Nathuji Dhage vs Spanco Nagpur Discom Ltd on 29 June, 2017
Cause Title/Judgement-Entry STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA ... DASARA ROAD,NEAR TAHSILDHAR MASJIT,MANBAJI SQUARE NAGPUR ...........Appellant(s) Versus 1. SPANCO NAGPUR DISCOM LTD NARANG TOWERS,CIVIL LINES,NAGPUR NAGPUR 2. SHRI
Infosys BPO 20.03
15. I-Service India Private Limited 9.73
16. Spanco Limited (Seg.) 8.94
17. Acropetal Technologies Ltd. (Seg.) 35.30
18. Wipro
Services Pvt Ltd 11.50%
12. R Systems International Ltd (Seg) 20.18%
13. Spanco Telesystems & Solutions Ltd (Seg) 25.81%
14. Accentia Technologies
segment is
below Rs. 1 crore for the FY 2006-07.
16.9 Spanco Ltd (Seg.) (Earlier known as Spanco Telesystems &
Solutions Ltd.)
This company
Technova Ltd. 12.65% Rejected
10. Shreejal Info Hubs Ltd. 0.00% Rejected
11. Spanco Ltd. 8.24% Rejected
12. Sparsh B P O Services Ltd. 7.22% Rejected
Maple Esolutions Limited 20.71
18 Mold-Tek Technologies Limited. 106.79
19 Spanco Limited (seg) 8.94
20 Triton Corp Limited 23.44
21 Galaxy Commercial
Info
Hubs Ltd. only 8.16% and in the case of Spanco Ltd. only 7.75%. Hence, it is
seen that there is very wide difference with